» Articles » PMID: 26846869

Anogenital Distance As a Marker of Androgen Exposure in Humans

Overview
Journal Andrology
Date 2016 Feb 6
PMID 26846869
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abnormal foetal testis development has been proposed to underlie common disorders of the male reproductive system such as cryptorchidism, hypospadias, reduced semen quality and testicular germ cell tumour, which are regarded as components of a 'testicular dysgenesis syndrome'. The increasing trends and geographical variation in their incidence have been suggested to result from in utero exposure to environmental chemicals acting as endocrine disruptors. In rodents, the anogenital distance (AGD), measured from the anus to the base of genital tubercle, is a sensitive biomarker of androgen exposure during a critical embryonic window of testis development. In humans, several epidemiological studies have shown alterations in AGD associated with prenatal exposure to several chemicals with potential endocrine disrupting activity. However, the link between AGD and androgen exposure in humans is not well-defined. This review focuses on the current evidence for such a relationship. As in rodents, a clear gender difference is detected during foetal development of the AGD in humans which is maintained thereafter. Reduced AGD in association with clinically relevant outcomes of potential environmental exposures, such as cryptorchidism or hypospadias, is in keeping with AGD as a marker of foetal testicular function. Furthermore, AGD may reflect variations in prenatal androgen exposure in healthy children as shorter AGD at birth is associated with reduced masculine play behaviour in preschool boys. Several studies provide evidence linking shorter AGD with lower fertility, semen quality and testosterone levels in selected groups of adults attending andrology clinics. Overall, the observational data in humans are consistent with experimental studies in animals and support the use of AGD as a biomarker of foetal androgen exposure. Future studies evaluating AGD in relation to reproductive hormones in both infants and adults, and to gene polymorphisms, will help to further delineate the effect of prenatal and postnatal androgen exposures on AGD.

Citing Articles

Testosterone mediates life-history trade-offs in female mammals.

Crespi B, Bushell A, Dinsdale N Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(2):871-891.

PMID: 39542451 PMC: 11885704. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13166.


The evolutionary basis of elevated testosterone in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews of the evidence.

Bushell A, Crespi B Front Reprod Health. 2024; 6:1475132.

PMID: 39403367 PMC: 11471738. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1475132.


Correlation of anogenital distance from childhood to age 9 years-a prospective population-based birth cohort-the Odense Child Cohort.

Andreasen S, Gehrt L, Hagen C, Juul A, Mola G, Fischer M Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(3):hoae050.

PMID: 39308771 PMC: 11415829. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae050.


Paternal obesity induces subfertility in male offspring by modulating the oxidative stress-related transcriptional network.

Li L, Ma Y, Zhu C, Li Y, Cao H, Wu Z Int J Obes (Lond). 2024; 48(9):1318-1331.

PMID: 38902387 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-024-01562-y.


Development and verification of machine learning model based on anogenital distance, penoscrotal distance, and 2D:4D finger ratio before puberty to predict hypospadias classification.

He Z, Yang B, Tang Y, Wang X Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1297642.

PMID: 38745832 PMC: 11091291. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1297642.


References
1.
Sathyanarayana S, Grady R, Redmon J, Ivicek K, Barrett E, Janssen S . Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES): methods and predictors. J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11(2):76.e1-6. PMC: 4456209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.018. View

2.
Bornehag C, Carlstedt F, Jonsson B, Lindh C, Jensen T, Bodin A . Prenatal phthalate exposures and anogenital distance in Swedish boys. Environ Health Perspect. 2014; 123(1):101-7. PMC: 4286276. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408163. View

3.
Vafeiadi M, Agramunt S, Papadopoulou E, Besselink H, Mathianaki K, Karakosta P . In utero exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like compounds and anogenital distance in newborns and infants. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 121(1):125-30. PMC: 3553434. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1205221. View

4.
Jain V, Singal A . Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(9):2343-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det286. View

5.
Eisenberg M, Shy M, Walters R, Lipshultz L . The relationship between anogenital distance and azoospermia in adult men. Int J Androl. 2012; 35(5):726-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01275.x. View