» Articles » PMID: 20126643

Improved Reconstruction of in Silico Gene Regulatory Networks by Integrating Knockout and Perturbation Data

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Feb 4
PMID 20126643
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed computational reconstruction of the in silico gene regulatory networks in the DREAM3 Challenges. Our task was to learn the networks from two types of data, namely gene expression profiles in deletion strains (the 'deletion data') and time series trajectories of gene expression after some initial perturbation (the 'perturbation data'). In the course of developing the prediction method, we observed that the two types of data contained different and complementary information about the underlying network. In particular, deletion data allow for the detection of direct regulatory activities with strong responses upon the deletion of the regulator while perturbation data provide richer information for the identification of weaker and more complex types of regulation. We applied different techniques to learn the regulation from the two types of data. For deletion data, we learned a noise model to distinguish real signals from random fluctuations using an iterative method. For perturbation data, we used differential equations to model the change of expression levels of a gene along the trajectories due to the regulation of other genes. We tried different models, and combined their predictions. The final predictions were obtained by merging the results from the two types of data. A comparison with the actual regulatory networks suggests that our approach is effective for networks with a range of different sizes. The success of the approach demonstrates the importance of integrating heterogeneous data in network reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Advances in computational and experimental approaches for deciphering transcriptional regulatory networks: Understanding the roles of cis-regulatory elements is essential, and recent research utilizing MPRAs, STARR-seq, CRISPR-Cas9, and machine....

Moeckel C, Mouratidis I, Chantzi N, Uzun Y, Georgakopoulos-Soares I Bioessays. 2024; 46(7):e2300210.

PMID: 38715516 PMC: 11444527. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202300210.


SPREd: a simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.

Wu Z, Sinha S Bioinform Adv. 2024; 4(1):vbae011.

PMID: 38444538 PMC: 10913396. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae011.


SPREd: A simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.

Wu Z, Sinha S bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38014297 PMC: 10680606. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.09.566399.


Reinforcement Learning Data-Acquiring for Causal Inference of Regulatory Networks.

Alali M, Imani M Proc Am Control Conf. 2023; 2023:3957-3964.

PMID: 37521901 PMC: 10382224. DOI: 10.23919/acc55779.2023.10155867.


REFINING CELLULAR PATHWAY MODELS USING AN ENSEMBLE OF HETEROGENEOUS DATA SOURCES.

Franks A, Markowetz F, Airoldi E Ann Appl Stat. 2022; 12(3):1361-1384.

PMID: 36506698 PMC: 9733905. DOI: 10.1214/16-aoas915.


References
1.
Wagner A . Reconstructing pathways in large genetic networks from genetic perturbations. J Comput Biol. 2004; 11(1):53-60. DOI: 10.1089/106652704773416885. View

2.
Cohen A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Eden E, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Issaeva I, Sigal A . Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science. 2008; 322(5907):1511-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1160165. View

3.
Hu Z, Killion P, Iyer V . Genetic reconstruction of a functional transcriptional regulatory network. Nat Genet. 2007; 39(5):683-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng2012. View

4.
Vu T, Vohradsky J . Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 35(1):279-87. PMC: 1802551. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl1001. View

5.
Stolovitzky G, Prill R, Califano A . Lessons from the DREAM2 Challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1158:159-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04497.x. View