» Articles » PMID: 20122438

Miniscrews in Orthodontic Treatment: Review and Analysis of Published Clinical Trials

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Feb 4
PMID 20122438
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: A systematic review of effects related to patient, screw, surgery, and loading on the stability of miniscrews was conducted.

Methods: Reports of clinical trials published before September 2007 with at least 30 miniscrews were reviewed. Parameters examined were patient sex and age, location and method of screw placement, screw length and diameter, time, and amount of loading.

Results: Fourteen clinical trials included 452 patients and 1519 screws. The mean overall success rate was 83.8% + or - 7.4%. Patient sex showed no significant differences. In terms of age, 1 of 5 studies with patients over 30 years of age showed a significant difference (P <0.05). Screw diameters of 1 to 1.1 mm yielded significantly lower success rates than those of 1.5 to 2.3 mm. One study reported significantly lower success rates for 6-mm vs 8-mm long miniscrews (72% vs 90%). Screw placement with or without a surgical flap showed contradictory results between studies. Three studies showed significantly higher success rates for maxillary than for mandibular screws. Loading and healing period were not significant in the miniscrews' success rates.

Conclusions: All 14 articles described success rates sufficient for orthodontic treatment. Placement protocols varied markedly. Screws under 8 mm in length and 1.2 mm in diameter should be avoided. Immediate or early loading up to 200 cN was adequate and showed no significant influence on screw stability.

Citing Articles

Anchorage and Stability of Orthodontic Mini Implants in Relation to Length and Types of Implants.

Selvaraj S, Tandon A, Chandrasekaran D, Purushothaman D, Katepogu P, Mohan R Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73056.

PMID: 39640137 PMC: 11620767. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73056.


What is the impact of patient attributes, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, and placement location on the success of orthodontic mini-implants in young adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Valeri C, Aloisio A, Marzo G, Costigliola G, Quinzi V Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(9):1149-1159.

PMID: 39286583 PMC: 11402018. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.07.013.


The Influence of the Diameter of Orthodontic Mini-Implants on Primary Stability: Bending Tests-An In Vitro Study.

Sousa-Santos C, Sousa-Santos S, Mendes J, Coelho C, Aroso C, Sousa-Santos P Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(13).

PMID: 38998232 PMC: 11242049. DOI: 10.3390/ma17133149.


Comparison of biomechanical performance of titanium and polyaryletheretherketone miniscrews at different insertion angles: A finite element analysis.

Aju Wahju Ardani I, Hariati I, Nugraha A, Narmada I, Syaifudin A, Perkasa I J Orthod Sci. 2024; 13:13.

PMID: 38784072 PMC: 11114449. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_102_23.


Success rate of infrazygomatic miniscrews considering their design and insertion techniques. A review.

Rodriguez-Rimachi M, Malpartida-Pacheco M, Olazabal-Martinez W Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 10(3):e117.

PMID: 38389546 PMC: 10880696. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1003-2022-117.