Semen Analysis with Regard to Sperm Number, Sperm Morphology and Functional Aspects

Overview

Journal Asian J Androl

Specialty Urology

Date 2010 Jan 30

PMID 20111078

Citations 25

Authors

Rune Eliasson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The new World Health Organization (WHO) Manual for Semen Analysis contains several improvements. One is that the 20 million spermatozoa per mL paradigm has been ousted in favour of proper calculations of lower reference limits for semen from men, whose partners had a time-to-pregnancy of 12 months or less. The recommendation to grade the progressive motility as described in the third and fourth editions of the WHO manual was not evidence-based, and WHO was therefore motivated to abandon it. However, the new recommendation is not evidence-based either, and it is difficult to understand the rational for the new assessment. It may have been a compromise to avoid returning to the rather robust system recommended in the first edition (1980). The unconditional recommendation of the 'Tygerberg strict criteria' is not evidence-based, and seems to be the result of an unfortunate bias in the composition of the Committee in favour of individuals known to support the 'strict criteria' method. This recommendation will have negative effects on the development of andrology as a scientific field. Given the importance of the WHO manual, it is unfortunate that the recommendations for such important variables, as motility and morphology, lack evidence-based support.

Citing Articles

A Review of Semen Analysis: Updates From the WHO Sixth Edition Manual and Advances in Male Fertility Assessment.

Chawre S, Khatib M, Rawekar A, Mahajan S, Jadhav R, More A Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63485.

PMID: 39081428 PMC: 11286598. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63485.

Cumulus matrix selection leads to isolation of spermatozoa with better motility, morphology, and lower DNA fragmentation.

Handzhiyska M, Ganeva R, Parvanov D, Ruseva M, Eftimov P, Georgieva V Reprod Fertil. 2024; .

PMID: 38670151 PMC: 11227069. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-23-0052.

Live motile sperm sorting device for enhanced sperm-fertilization competency: comparative analysis with density-gradient centrifugation and microfluidic sperm sorting.

Hsu C, Lee C, Lin F, Wang F, Chang H, Wang T J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(8):1855-1864.

PMID: 37300647 PMC: 10371955. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02838-4.

Stress decreases spermatozoa quality and induces molecular alterations in zebrafish progeny.

Valcarce D, Riesco M, Cuesta-Martin L, Esteve-Codina A, Martinez-Vazquez J, Robles V BMC Biol. 2023; 21(1):70.

PMID: 37013516 PMC: 10071778. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01570-w.

Sperm Phosphoproteome: Unraveling Male Infertility.

Serrano R, Garcia-Marin L, Bragado M Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35625387 PMC: 9137924. DOI: 10.3390/biology11050659.

References

Toner J, Mossad H, Grow D, Morshedi M, Swanson R, Oehninger S . Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial (intrauterine) insemination. Andrologia. 1995; 27(3):143-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1995.tb01085.x. View

Morgentaler A, Fung M, Harris D, Powers R, Alper M . Sperm morphology and in vitro fertilization outcome: a direct comparison of World Health Organization and strict criteria methodologies. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64(6):1177-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57981-3. View

Garrett C, Liu D, Clarke G, Rushford D, Baker H . Automated semen analysis: 'zona pellucida preferred' sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(8):1643-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg306. View

Menkveld R, Wong W, Lombard C, Wetzels A, Thomas C, Merkus H . Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(6):1165-71. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1165. View

MacLeod J, Wang Y . Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: a review of the past, a study of the present. Fertil Steril. 1979; 31(2):103-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43808-2. View

Holstein A, Schulze W, Davidoff M . Understanding spermatogenesis is a prerequisite for treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003; 1:107. PMC: 293421. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-107. View

Liu D, Garrett C, Baker H . Low proportions of sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(11):2382-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg456. View

David G, Jouannet P, Spira A, Schwartz D . Sperm counts in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 1979; 31(4):453-5. View

Jouannet P, Ducot B, Feneux D, Spira A . Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl. 1988; 11(5):379-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1988.tb01011.x. View

10.

van Zyl J, Menkveld R, van Kotze T, Retief A, Van Niekerk W . Oligozoospermia: a seven-year survey of the incidence, chromosomal aberrations, treatment and pregnancy rate. Int J Fertil. 1975; 20(3):129-32. View

11.

Van der Merwe F, Kruger T, Oehninger S, Lombard C . The use of semen parameters to identify the subfertile male in the general population. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004; 59(2):86-91. DOI: 10.1159/000082368. View

12.

Smith K, Rodriguez-Rigau L, Steinberger E . Relation between indices of semen analysis and pregnancy rate in infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1977; 28(12):1314-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42976-6. View

13.

Coetzee K, Kruge T, Lombard C . Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update. 1998; 4(1):73-82. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/4.1.73. View

14.

Eggert-Kruse W, Schwarz H, Rohr G, Demirakca T, Tilgen W, RUNNEBAUM B . Sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and male fertility under in-vivo conditions of conception. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11(1):139-46. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019007. View

15.

Handelsman D, Conway A, Boylan L, Turtle J . Testicular function in potential sperm donors: normal ranges and the effects of smoking and varicocele. Int J Androl. 1984; 7(5):369-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1984.tb00794.x. View

16.

Mortimer D, Menkveld R . Sperm morphology assessment--historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl. 2001; 22(2):192-205. View

17.

Sobrero A, Rehan N . The semen of fertile men. II. Semen characteristics of 100 fertile men. Fertil Steril. 1975; 26(11):1048-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)41469-x. View

18.

Zukerman Z, Rodriguez-Rigau L, Smith K, Steinberger E . Frequency distribution of sperm counts in fertile and infertile males. Fertil Steril. 1977; 28(12):1310-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42975-4. View

19.

Andersen A, Jensen T, Carlsen E, Jorgensen N, Andersson A, Krarup T . High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(2):366-72. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.366. View

20.

Van Waart J, Kruger T, Lombard C, Ombelet W . Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7(5):495-500. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/7.5.495. View