» Articles » PMID: 20098500

SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization During Antibody-antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology Models

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 26
PMID 20098500
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High resolution structures of antibody-antigen complexes are useful for analyzing the binding interface and to make rational choices for antibody engineering. When a crystallographic structure of a complex is unavailable, the structure must be predicted using computational tools. In this work, we illustrate a novel approach, named SnugDock, to predict high-resolution antibody-antigen complex structures by simultaneously structurally optimizing the antibody-antigen rigid-body positions, the relative orientation of the antibody light and heavy chains, and the conformations of the six complementarity determining region loops. This approach is especially useful when the crystal structure of the antibody is not available, requiring allowances for inaccuracies in an antibody homology model which would otherwise frustrate rigid-backbone docking predictions. Local docking using SnugDock with the lowest-energy RosettaAntibody homology model produced more accurate predictions than standard rigid-body docking. SnugDock can be combined with ensemble docking to mimic conformer selection and induced fit resulting in increased sampling of diverse antibody conformations. The combined algorithm produced four medium (Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions-CAPRI rating) and seven acceptable lowest-interface-energy predictions in a test set of fifteen complexes. Structural analysis shows that diverse paratope conformations are sampled, but docked paratope backbones are not necessarily closer to the crystal structure conformations than the starting homology models. The accuracy of SnugDock predictions suggests a new genre of general docking algorithms with flexible binding interfaces targeted towards making homology models useful for further high-resolution predictions.

Citing Articles

What does AlphaFold3 learn about antigen and nanobody docking, and what remains unsolved?.

Hitawala F, Gray J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975279 PMC: 11838198. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.21.614257.


Nanobody screening and machine learning guided identification of cross-variant anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing heavy-chain only antibodies.

McIlroy P, Pham L, Sheffield T, Stefan M, Thatcher C, Jaryenneh J PLoS Pathog. 2025; 21(1):e1012903.

PMID: 39847604 PMC: 11793827. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012903.


Development of a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the TRBV5-1 segment of the T cell receptor for the treatment of mature T cell neoplasms.

Pitaro M, Antonini G, Arcovito A, Buccisano F, De Lauro A, Irno Consalvo M Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1520103.

PMID: 39742266 PMC: 11686114. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1520103.


Preclinical development of three novel CARs targeting CD79b for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and characterization of the loss of the target antigen.

Esquinas E, Moreno-Sanz A, Sanda V, Stodulski-Ciesla D, Borregon J, Pena-Blanque V J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12(12.

PMID: 39694704 PMC: 11667269. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009485.


Epitope mapping via in vitro deep mutational scanning methods and its applications.

Keen M, Keith A, Ortlund E J Biol Chem. 2024; 301(1):108072.

PMID: 39674321 PMC: 11783119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108072.


References
1.
Bonvin A . Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006; 16(2):194-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.002. View

2.
Lippow S, Wittrup K, Tidor B . Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25(10):1171-6. PMC: 2803018. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1336. View

3.
Zemlin M, Klinger M, Link J, Zemlin C, Bauer K, Engler J . Expressed murine and human CDR-H3 intervals of equal length exhibit distinct repertoires that differ in their amino acid composition and predicted range of structures. J Mol Biol. 2003; 334(4):733-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.007. View

4.
Vajda S, Vakser I, Sternberg M, Janin J . Modeling of protein interactions in genomes. Proteins. 2002; 47(4):444-6. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10112. View

5.
Chaudhury S, Sircar A, Sivasubramanian A, Berrondo M, Gray J . Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6-12. Proteins. 2007; 69(4):793-800. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21731. View