» Articles » PMID: 20097828

Anaerobic Digestion of Renewable Biomass: Thermophilic Temperature Governs Methanogen Population Dynamics

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 26
PMID 20097828
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Beet silage and beet juice were digested continuously as representative energy crops in a thermophilic biogas fermentor for more than 7 years. Fluorescence microscopy of 15 samples covering a period of 650 days revealed that a decrease in temperature from 60 degrees C to 55 degrees C converted a morphologically uniform archaeal population (rods) into a population of methanogens exhibiting different cellular morphologies (rods and coccoid cells). A subsequent temperature increase back to 60 degrees C reestablished the uniform morphology of methanogens observed in the previous 60 degrees C period. In order to verify these observations, representative samples were investigated by amplified rRNA gene restriction analysis (ARDRA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Both methods confirmed the temperature-dependent population shift observed by fluorescence microscopy. Moreover, all samples investigated demonstrated that hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriales dominated in the fermentor, as 29 of 34 identified operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were assigned to this order. This apparent discrimination of acetoclastic methanogens contradicts common models for anaerobic digestion processes, such as anaerobic digestion model 1 (ADM1), which describes the acetotrophic Euryarchaeota as predominant organisms.

Citing Articles

Methanogen Community Dynamics and Methanogenic Function Response to Solid Waste Decomposition.

Yang S, Li L, Peng X, Zhang R, Song L Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:743827.

PMID: 34707594 PMC: 8542853. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.743827.


Metagenomics survey unravels diversity of biogas microbiomes with potential to enhance productivity in Kenya.

Muturi S, Muthui L, Njogu P, Onguso J, Wachira F, Opiyo S PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0244755.

PMID: 33395690 PMC: 7781671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244755.


Microbiome digital signature of MCR genes - an approach to study the diversity of methanogenic population in laboratory-developed and pilot-scale anaerobic digesters.

Ponni Keerthana K, Radhesh Krishnan S, Ragunath Sengali S, Srinivasan R, Prabhakaran N, Balaji G Access Microbiol. 2020; 1(5):e000044.

PMID: 32974529 PMC: 7470284. DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000044.


A Review of Landfill Microbiology and Ecology: A Call for Modernization With 'Next Generation' Technology.

Meyer-Dombard D, Bogner J, Malas J Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:1127.

PMID: 32582086 PMC: 7283466. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01127.


Different response of bacteria, archaea and fungi to process parameters in nine full-scale anaerobic digesters.

Langer S, Gabris C, Einfalt D, Wemheuer B, Kazda M, Bengelsdorf F Microb Biotechnol. 2019; 12(6):1210-1225.

PMID: 30995692 PMC: 6801161. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13409.


References
1.
Tilche A, Galatola M . The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective. Water Sci Technol. 2008; 57(11):1683-92. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.039. View

2.
Vilgalys R, Hester M . Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol. 1990; 172(8):4238-46. PMC: 213247. DOI: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. View

3.
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Klugbauer S, Klugbauer N, Weizenegger M, Neumaier J . Bacterial phylogeny based on comparative sequence analysis. Electrophoresis. 1998; 19(4):554-68. DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150190416. View

4.
Janssen P, Kirs M . Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008; 74(12):3619-25. PMC: 2446570. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02812-07. View

5.
Borjesson P, Mattiasson B . Biogas as a resource-efficient vehicle fuel. Trends Biotechnol. 2007; 26(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.09.007. View