Three-dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy of Biological Specimens

Overview

Journal Microsc Microanal

Publisher Oxford University Press

Date 2010 Jan 20

PMID 20082729

Citations 10

Authors

Niels de Jonge

Rachid Sougrat

Brian M Northan

Stephen J Pennycook

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the cytoskeleton and a clathrin-coated pit in mammalian cells has been achieved from a focal-series of images recorded in an aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM). The specimen was a metallic replica of the biological structure comprising Pt nanoparticles 2-3 nm in diameter, with a high stability under electron beam radiation. The 3D dataset was processed by an automated deconvolution procedure. The lateral resolution was 1.1 nm, set by pixel size. Particles differing by only 10 nm in vertical position were identified as separate objects with greater than 20% dip in contrast between them. We refer to this value as the axial resolution of the deconvolution or reconstruction, the ability to recognize two objects, which were unresolved in the original dataset. The resolution of the reconstruction is comparable to that achieved by tilt-series transmission electron microscopy. However, the focal-series method does not require mechanical tilting and is therefore much faster. 3D STEM images were also recorded of the Golgi ribbon in conventional thin sections containing 3T3 cells with a comparable axial resolution in the deconvolved dataset.

Citing Articles

The nanoscale molecular morphology of docked exocytic dense-core vesicles in neuroendocrine cells.

Prasai B, Haber G, Strub M, Ahn R, Ciemniecki J, Sochacki K Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3970.

PMID: 34172739 PMC: 8233335. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24167-9.

Quantification and optimization of ADF-STEM image contrast for beam-sensitive materials.

Gnanasekaran K, de With G, Friedrich H R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(5):171838.

PMID: 29892376 PMC: 5990820. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171838.

Comparison of 3D cellular imaging techniques based on scanned electron probes: Serial block face SEM vs. Axial bright-field STEM tomography.

McBride E, Rao A, Zhang G, Hoyne J, Calco G, Kuo B J Struct Biol. 2018; 202(3):216-228.

PMID: 29408702 PMC: 8349566. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.01.012.

Electron tomography simulator with realistic 3D phantom for evaluation of acquisition, alignment and reconstruction methods.

Wan X, Katchalski T, Churas C, Ghosh S, Phan S, Lawrence A J Struct Biol. 2017; 198(2):103-115.

PMID: 28392451 PMC: 5773259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.04.002.

Feature Adaptive Sampling for Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Dahmen T, Engstler M, Pauly C, Trampert P, de Jonge N, Mucklich F Sci Rep. 2016; 6:25350.

PMID: 27150131 PMC: 4858653. DOI: 10.1038/srep25350.

References

Luther P, Lawrence M, Crowther R . A method for monitoring the collapse of plastic sections as a function of electron dose. Ultramicroscopy. 1988; 24(1):7-18. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(88)90322-1. View

Lucic V, Forster F, Baumeister W . Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005; 74:833-65. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074112. View

Xin H, Muller D . Aberration-corrected ADF-STEM depth sectioning and prospects for reliable 3D imaging in S/TEM. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2009; 58(3):157-65. DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfn029. View

Nellist P, Chisholm M, Dellby N, Krivanek O, Murfitt M, Szilagyi Z . Direct sub-angstrom imaging of a crystal lattice. Science. 2004; 305(5691):1741. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100965. View

Stahlberg H, Walz T . Molecular electron microscopy: state of the art and current challenges. ACS Chem Biol. 2008; 3(5):268-81. PMC: 2660199. DOI: 10.1021/cb800037d. View

Kremer J, Mastronarde D, McIntosh J . Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol. 1996; 116(1):71-6. DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013. View

Kubel C, Voigt A, Schoenmakers R, Otten M, Su D, Lee T . Recent advances in electron tomography: TEM and HAADF-STEM tomography for materials science and semiconductor applications. Microsc Microanal. 2007; 11(5):378-400. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927605050361. View

Borisevich A, Lupini A, Pennycook S . Depth sectioning with the aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(9):3044-8. PMC: 1413870. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507105103. View

Carrington W, Lynch R, Moore E, Isenberg G, Fogarty K, Fay F . Superresolution three-dimensional images of fluorescence in cells with minimal light exposure. Science. 1995; 268(5216):1483-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.7770772. View

10.

Bartesaghi A, Sprechmann P, Liu J, Randall G, Sapiro G, Subramaniam S . Classification and 3D averaging with missing wedge correction in biological electron tomography. J Struct Biol. 2008; 162(3):436-50. PMC: 2556382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.02.008. View

11.

Haider , Uhlemann , Zach . Upper limits for the residual aberrations of a high-resolution aberration-corrected STEM. Ultramicroscopy. 2000; 81(3-4):163-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(99)00194-1. View

12.

Sousa A, Hohmann-Marriott M, Aronova M, Zhang G, Leapman R . Determination of quantitative distributions of heavy-metal stain in biological specimens by annular dark-field STEM. J Struct Biol. 2008; 162(1):14-28. PMC: 2705981. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.01.007. View

13.

Xiao Y, Patolsky F, Katz E, Hainfeld J, Willner I . "Plugging into Enzymes": nanowiring of redox enzymes by a gold nanoparticle. Science. 2003; 299(5614):1877-81. DOI: 10.1126/science.1080664. View

14.

Takeguchi M, Hashimoto A, Shimojo M, Mitsuishi K, Furuya K . Development of a stage-scanning system for high-resolution confocal STEM. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2008; 57(4):123-7. DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfn010. View

15.

Burnette D, Schaefer A, Ji L, Danuser G, Forscher P . Filopodial actin bundles are not necessary for microtubule advance into the peripheral domain of Aplysia neuronal growth cones. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9(12):1360-9. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1655. View

16.

Marsh B, Volkmann N, McIntosh J, Howell K . Direct continuities between cisternae at different levels of the Golgi complex in glucose-stimulated mouse islet beta cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(15):5565-70. PMC: 397423. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0401242101. View

17.

Behan G, Cosgriff E, Kirkland A, Nellist P . Three-dimensional imaging by optical sectioning in the aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009; 367(1903):3825-44. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0074. View

18.

de Jonge N, Peckys D, Kremers G, Piston D . Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(7):2159-64. PMC: 2650183. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809567106. View

19.

Svitkina T, Verkhovsky A, Borisy G . Improved procedures for electron microscopic visualization of the cytoskeleton of cultured cells. J Struct Biol. 1995; 115(3):290-303. DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.1995.1054. View

20.

Hell S . Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science. 2007; 316(5828):1153-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1137395. View