» Articles » PMID: 20080232

The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient Increases in Attention to One Task Enhance Performance in a Second Task

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Jan 19
PMID 20080232
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent work on event perception suggests that perceptual processing increases when events change. An important question is how such changes influence the way other information is processed, particularly during dual-task performance. In this study, participants monitored a long series of distractor items for an occasional target as they simultaneously encoded unrelated background scenes. The appearance of an occasional target could have two opposite effects on the secondary task: It could draw attention away from the second task, or, as a change in the ongoing event, it could improve secondary task performance. Results were consistent with the second possibility. Memory for scenes presented simultaneously with the targets was better than memory for scenes that preceded or followed the targets. This effect was observed when the primary detection task involved visual feature oddball detection, auditory oddball detection, and visual color-shape conjunction detection. It was eliminated when the detection task was omitted, and when it required an arbitrary response mapping. The appearance of occasional, task-relevant events appears to trigger a temporal orienting response that facilitates processing of concurrently attended information (Attentional Boost Effect).

Citing Articles

The attentional boost effect: current landscape and future directions.

Au R, Tang A Cogn Process. 2025; .

PMID: 40085301 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-025-01266-9.


Attention-dependent coupling with forebrain and brainstem neuromodulatory nuclei differs across the lifespan.

Cicero N, Riley E, Swallow K, De Rosa E, Anderson A Geroscience. 2025; .

PMID: 40038158 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-025-01582-0.


Effects of Language Proficiency on Selective Attention Patterns at Segmenting Boundaries in English Audio Sentences.

Mei Y, Chen F, Chen X Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766403 PMC: 11674264. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121204.


Recognition memory fluctuates with sustained attention regardless of task relevance.

Corriveau A, Chao A, deBettencourt M, Rosenberg M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .

PMID: 39285130 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02560-x.


Surprising sounds influence risky decision making.

Feng G, Rutledge R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8027.

PMID: 39271674 PMC: 11399252. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51729-4.


References
1.
Pashler H . Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994; 116(2):220-44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220. View

2.
Robbins T . Arousal systems and attentional processes. Biol Psychol. 1997; 45(1-3):57-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05222-2. View

3.
Hunt R, Lamb C . What causes the isolation effect?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(6):1359-66. View

4.
Olivers C, Van der Burg E . Bleeping you out of the blink: sound saves vision from oblivion. Brain Res. 2008; 1242:191-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.070. View

5.
Park H, Arndt J, Reder L . A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition. Mem Cognit. 2006; 34(4):743-51. PMC: 2387213. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193422. View