» Articles » PMID: 17338600

Event Perception: a Mind-brain Perspective

Overview
Journal Psychol Bull
Specialty Psychology
Date 2007 Mar 7
PMID 17338600
Citations 270
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People perceive and conceive of activity in terms of discrete events. Here the authors propose a theory according to which the perception of boundaries between events arises from ongoing perceptual processing and regulates attention and memory. Perceptual systems continuously make predictions about what will happen next. When transient errors in predictions arise, an event boundary is perceived. According to the theory, the perception of events depends on both sensory cues and knowledge structures that represent previously learned information about event parts and inferences about actors' goals and plans. Neurological and neurophysiological data suggest that representations of events may be implemented by structures in the lateral prefrontal cortex and that perceptual prediction error is calculated and evaluated by a processing pathway, including the anterior cingulate cortex and subcortical neuromodulatory systems.

Citing Articles

The attentional boost effect: current landscape and future directions.

Au R, Tang A Cogn Process. 2025; .

PMID: 40085301 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-025-01266-9.


Fast-timescale hippocampal processes bridge between slowly unfurling neocortical states during memory search.

Michelmann S, Dugan P, Doyle W, Friedman D, Melloni L, Strauss C bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990462 PMC: 11844493. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.11.637471.


Neurobiological influences on event perception: the role of catecholamines.

Ghorbani F, Zhou X, Roessner V, Hommel B, Prochnow A, Beste C Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025; 28(2).

PMID: 39981699 PMC: 11879076. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf008.


Neural codes track prior events in a narrative and predict subsequent memory for details.

Collin S, Kempner R, Srivatsan S, Norman K Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):26.

PMID: 39956878 PMC: 11830764. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00211-y.


Dynamicity Predicts Inferred Temporal Order in Complex Sentences: Evidence from English, German, and Polish.

Marx E, Iwan O, Wittenberg E Cogn Sci. 2025; 49(2):e70038.

PMID: 39951619 PMC: 11828478. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70038.


References
1.
Zwaan R, Stanfield R, Yaxley R . Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(2):168-71. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430. View

2.
Schwan S, Garsoffky B, Hesse F . Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences?. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(2):214-23. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213801. View

3.
Weingartner H, Grafman J, Boutelle W, Kaye W, Martin P . Forms of memory failure. Science. 1983; 221(4608):380-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.6867715. View

4.
Kintsch W . Text comprehension, memory, and learning. Am Psychol. 1994; 49(4):294-303. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.4.294. View

5.
Fuster J . The prefrontal cortex and its relation to behavior. Prog Brain Res. 1991; 87:201-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63053-8. View