» Articles » PMID: 20058556

Experimental Study of Blast-induced Traumatic Brain Injury Using a Physical Head Model

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2010 Jan 12
PMID 20058556
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was conducted to quantify intracranial biomechanical responses and external blast overpressures using physical head model to understand the biomechanics of blast traumatic brain injury and to provide experimental data for computer simulation of blast-induced brain trauma. Ellipsoidal-shaped physical head models, made from 3-mm polycarbonate shell filled with Sylgard 527 silicon gel, were used. Six blast tests were conducted in frontal, side, and 45 degrees oblique orientations. External blast overpressures and internal pressures were quantified with ballistic pressure sensors. Blast overpressures, ranging from 129.5 kPa to 769.3 kPa, were generated using a rigid cannon and 1.3 to 3.0 grams of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) plastic sheet explosive (explosive yield of 13.24 kJ and TNT equivalent mass of 2.87 grams for 3 grams of material). The PETN plastic sheet explosive consisted of 63% PETN powder, 29% plasticizer, and 8% nitrocellulose with a density of 1.48 g/cm3 and detonation velocity of 6.8 km/s. Propagation and reflection of the shockwave was captured using a shadowgraph technique. Shockwave speeds ranging from 423.3 m/s to 680.3 m/s were recorded. The model demonstrated a two-stage response: a pressure dominant (overpressure) stage followed by kinematic dominant (blast wind) stage. Positive pressures in the brain simulant ranged from 75.1 kPa to 1095 kPa, and negative pressures ranged from -43.6 kPa to -646.0 kPa. High- and normal-speed videos did not reveal observable deformations in the brain simulant from the neutral density markers embedded in the midsagittal plane of the head model. Amplitudes of the internal positive and negative pressures were found to linearly correlate with external overpressure. Results from the current study suggested a pressure-dominant brain injury mechanism instead of strain injury mechanism under the blast severity of the current study. These quantitative results also served as the validation and calibration data for computer simulation models of blast brain injuries.

Citing Articles

A Review of Cyclist Head Injury, Impact Characteristics and the Implications for Helmet Assessment Methods.

Baker C, Yu X, Patel S, Ghajari M Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 51(5):875-904.

PMID: 36918438 PMC: 10122631. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03148-7.


Characterization of material properties and deformation in the ANGUS phantom during mild head impacts using MRI.

Knutsen A, Vidhate S, McIlvain G, Luster J, Galindo E, Johnson C J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022; 138:105586.

PMID: 36516544 PMC: 10169236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105586.


Revealing the Effect of Skull Deformation on Intracranial Pressure Variation During the Direct Interaction Between Blast Wave and Surrogate Head.

Du Z, Li Z, Wang P, Wang X, Zhang J, Zhuang Z Ann Biomed Eng. 2022; 50(9):1038-1052.

PMID: 35668281 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02982-5.


A Novel Multi-Axial Pressure Sensor Probe for Measuring Triaxial Stress States Inside Soft Materials.

Zullo G, Silvestroni A, Candiotto G, Koptyug A, Petrone N Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(10).

PMID: 34067759 PMC: 8155985. DOI: 10.3390/s21103487.


Displacement Error Propagation From Embedded Markers to Brain Strain.

Zhao W, Wu Z, Ji S J Biomech Eng. 2021; 143(10).

PMID: 33954705 PMC: 8299812. DOI: 10.1115/1.4051050.