» Articles » PMID: 20053642

Systemic Factors Dominate Mammal Protein Evolution

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 8
PMID 20053642
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Proteins encoded by highly expressed genes evolve more slowly. This correlation is thought to arise owing to purifying selection against toxicity of misfolded proteins (that should be more crucial for highly expressed genes). It is now widely accepted that this individual (by-gene) effect is a dominant cause in protein evolution. Here, I show that in mammals, the evolutionary rate of a protein is much more strongly related to the evolutionary rate of coexpressed proteins (and proteins of the same biological pathway) than to the expression level of its encoding gene. The complexity of gene regulation (estimated by the numbers of transcription factor targets and regulatory microRNA targets in the encoding gene) is another important cause, which is much stronger than gene expression level. Proteins encoded by complexly regulated genes evolve more slowly. The intronic length and the ratio of intronic to coding sequence lengths also correlate negatively with protein evolutionary rate (which contradicts the expectation from the negative link between expression level and evolutionary rate). One more important factor, which is much stronger than gene expression level, is evolutionary age. More recent proteins evolve faster, and expression level of an encoding gene becomes quite a minor cause in the evolution of mammal proteins of metazoan origin. These data suggest that, in contrast to a widespread opinion, systemic factors dominate mammal protein evolution.

Citing Articles

Genes encoding the photosystem II proteins are under purifying selection: an insight into the early evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis.

Slesak I, Mazur Z, Slesak H Photosynth Res. 2022; 153(3):163-175.

PMID: 35648248 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-022-00917-8.


Accelerated pathway evolution in mouse-like rodents involves cell cycle control.

Vinogradov A Mamm Genome. 2015; 26(11-12):609-18.

PMID: 26424469 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-015-9605-8.


Phylogenetic and biological significance of evolutionary elements from metazoan mitochondrial genomes.

Yuan J, Zhu Q, Liu B PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e84330.

PMID: 24465405 PMC: 3896360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084330.


Three independent determinants of protein evolutionary rate.

Choi S, Hannenhalli S J Mol Evol. 2013; 76(3):98-111.

PMID: 23400388 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-013-9543-6.


A conserved mammalian protein interaction network.

Perez-Bercoff A, Hudson C, Conant G PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e52581.

PMID: 23320073 PMC: 3539715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052581.


References
1.
Koonin E, Fedorova N, Jackson J, Jacobs A, Krylov D, Makarova K . A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2004; 5(2):R7. PMC: 395751. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r7. View

2.
Eisenberg E, Levanon E . Human housekeeping genes are compact. Trends Genet. 2003; 19(7):362-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00140-9. View

3.
LARKIN M, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan P, McWilliam H . Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(21):2947-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. View

4.
Vinogradov A . "Genome design" model: evidence from conserved intronic sequence in human-mouse comparison. Genome Res. 2006; 16(3):347-54. PMC: 1415212. DOI: 10.1101/gr.4318206. View

5.
Castillo-Davis C, Mekhedov S, Hartl D, Koonin E, Kondrashov F . Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet. 2002; 31(4):415-8. DOI: 10.1038/ng940. View