Clinical and Immunological Responses in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Vaccinated with a High-dose Poly-epitope Vaccine
Overview
Oncology
Pharmacology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Safety and cellular immunogenicity of rising doses and varying regimens of a poly-epitope vaccine were evaluated in advanced metastatic melanoma. The vaccine comprised plasmid DNA and recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) both expressing a string (Mel3) of seven HLA.A2/A1 epitopes from five melanoma antigens.
Methods: Forty-one HLA-A2 positive patients with stage III/IV melanoma were enrolled. Patient groups received one or two doses of DNA.Mel3 followed by escalating doses of MVA.Mel3. Immunisations then continued eight weekly in the absence of disease progression. Epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses were evaluated using ex-vivo tetramer and IFN-gamma ELISPOT assays. Safety and clinical responses were monitored.
Results: Prime-boost DNA/MVA induced Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell responses in 22/31 (71%) patients detected by tetramer assay. ELISPOT detected a response to at least one epitope in 10/31 (32%) patients. T cell responder rates were <50% with low-dose DNA/MVA, or MVA alone, rising to 91% with high-dose DNA/MVA. Among eight patients showing evidence of clinical benefit-one PR (24 months+), five SD (5 months+) and two mixed responses-seven had associated immune responses. Melan-A-tetramer+ immunity was associated with a median 8-week increase in time-to-progression (P = 0.037) and 71 week increase in survival (P = 0.0002) compared to non-immunity. High-dose vaccine was well tolerated. The only significant toxicities were flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions.
Conclusions: DNA.Mel3 and MVA.Mel3 in a prime-boost protocol generated high rates of immune response to melanoma antigen epitopes. The treatment was well tolerated and the correlation of immune responses with patient outcomes encourages further investigation.
Toward QbD Process Understanding on DNA Vaccine Purification Using Design of Experiment.
Hocharoen L, Noppiboon S, Kitsubun P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:657201.
PMID: 34055759 PMC: 8153680. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.657201.
Gilfillan C, Hebeisen M, Rufer N, Speiser D Eur J Immunol. 2021; 51(6):1348-1360.
PMID: 33704770 PMC: 8252569. DOI: 10.1002/eji.202049016.
Process Characterization by Definitive Screening Design Approach on DNA Vaccine Production.
Hocharoen L, Noppiboon S, Kitsubun P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:574809.
PMID: 33178673 PMC: 7593689. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.574809.
Carretero-Iglesia L, Couturaud B, Baumgaertner P, Schmidt J, Maby-El Hajjami H, Speiser D Front Immunol. 2020; 10:3016.
PMID: 31969886 PMC: 6960191. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03016.
Elements in the Development of a Production Process for Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara.
Jordan I, Lohr V, Genzel Y, Reichl U, Sandig V Microorganisms. 2016; 1(1):100-121.
PMID: 27694766 PMC: 5029493. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms1010100.