» Articles » PMID: 20033392

[Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee Joint]

Overview
Journal Orthopade
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2009 Dec 25
PMID 20033392
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The demographic developments and an increasing number of total knee replacements will lead to more periprosthetic fractures in the future. These fractures can be classified into intraoperative and postoperative. Revisions in particular are associated with a higher incidence of intra-operative fractures, specifically for the tibia and patella. Most fractures occur in the postoperative period with an average of 2-4 years after the primary procedure. Most commonly the femur is involved. The history and clinical examination as well as imaging are crucial for the treatment as loose components would significantly alter the treatment strategy. In this case a revision has to be carefully planned. In the majority of the cases the prosthesis is well fixed especially at the femur. An open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) can then be carried out. A stable situation must be achieved to provide early post-operative mobilization. Also an anatomic reduction should be achieved with correct alignment especially with respect to varus/valgus and rotation. Modern locked implants can provide this with good success also with the possibility of minimally invasive techniques and polyaxial screw positioning. Retrograde intramedullary devices can be a feasible alternative. Similar principles can be used for the tibia whereas the patella can be stabilized with tension band wiring in the case of good bone stock but still remains a problem in case of bad bone stock.

Citing Articles

KNEE PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY: CURRENT CONCEPT.

Pellegrino A, Coscione A, Santulli A, Pellegrino G, Paracuollo M Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022; 14(6):38566.

PMID: 36267221 PMC: 9568416. DOI: 10.52965/001c.38566.


Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty - an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue.

Schreiner A, Schmidutz F, Ateschrang A, Ihle C, Stockle U, Ochs B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19(1):323.

PMID: 30200931 PMC: 6131855. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2250-0.


[Osteosynthesis after periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint].

Von Matthey F, Ruchholtz S, Biberthaler P, Hanschen M Unfallchirurg. 2016; 119(4):288-94.

PMID: 26992714 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-016-0162-8.


[Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems].

Fuchs M, Perka C, von Roth P Unfallchirurg. 2016; 119(3):185-93.

PMID: 26886903 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-016-0144-x.


[Periprosthetic knee fractures].

Mittlmeier T, Beck M, Bosch U, Wichelhaus A Orthopade. 2015; 45(1):54-64.

PMID: 26646945 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-015-3205-x.


References
1.
Crossett L, Sinha R, Sechriest V, Rubash H . Reconstruction of a ruptured patellar tendon with achilles tendon allograft following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(8):1354-61. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200208000-00010. View

2.
Nicholls R, Green D, Kuster M . Patella intraosseous blood flow disturbance during a medial or lateral arthrotomy in total knee arthroplasty: a laser Doppler flowmetry study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(5):411-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0703-0. View

3.
Erhardt J, Grob K, Roderer G, Hoffmann A, Forster T, Kuster M . Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the non-contact bridging plate: a new angular stable implant. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 128(4):409-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0396-6. View

4.
Su E, DeWal H, Di Cesare P . Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12(1):12-20. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200401000-00003. View

5.
Rorabeck C, Taylor J . Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(2):265-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70081-x. View