» Articles » PMID: 20023160

Role of Notch Signaling in Establishing the Hemilineages of Secondary Neurons in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Development
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 Dec 22
PMID 20023160
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The secondary neurons generated in the thoracic central nervous system of Drosophila arise from a hemisegmental set of 25 neuronal stem cells, the neuroblasts (NBs). Each NB undergoes repeated asymmetric divisions to produce a series of smaller ganglion mother cells (GMCs), which typically divide once to form two daughter neurons. We find that the two daughters of the GMC consistently have distinct fates. Using both loss-of-function and gain-of-function approaches, we examined the role of Notch signaling in establishing neuronal fates within all of the thoracic secondary lineages. In all cases, the 'A' (Notch(ON)) sibling assumes one fate and the 'B' (Notch(OFF)) sibling assumes another, and this relationship holds throughout the neurogenic period, resulting in two major neuronal classes: the A and B hemilineages. Apparent monotypic lineages typically result from the death of one sibling throughout the lineage, resulting in a single, surviving hemilineage. Projection neurons are predominantly from the B hemilineages, whereas local interneurons are typically from A hemilineages. Although sibling fate is dependent on Notch signaling, it is not necessarily dependent on numb, a gene classically involved in biasing Notch activation. When Numb was removed at the start of larval neurogenesis, both A and B hemilineages were still generated, but by the start of the third larval instar, the removal of Numb resulted in all neurons assuming the A fate. The need for Numb to direct Notch signaling correlated with a decrease in NB cell cycle time and may be a means for coping with multiple sibling pairs simultaneously undergoing fate decisions.

Citing Articles

Temporal and Notch identity determine layer targeting and synapse location of medulla neurons.

Holguera I, Chen Y, Chen Y, Simon F, Gaffney A, Rodas J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829863 PMC: 11741259. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.06.631439.


The role of Imp and Syp RNA-binding proteins in precise neuronal elimination by apoptosis through the regulation of transcription factors.

Guan W, Nie Z, Laurencon A, Bouchet M, Godin C, Kabir C Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39364747 PMC: 11452180. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91634.


Indirect neurogenesis in space and time.

Thor S Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024; 25(8):519-534.

PMID: 38951687 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00833-x.


Novel Genome-Engineered Alleles Differentially Affect Lateral Inhibition and Cell Dichotomy Processes during Bristle Organ Development.

Monch T, Smylla T, Brandle F, Preiss A, Nagel A Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(5).

PMID: 38790181 PMC: 11121709. DOI: 10.3390/genes15050552.


Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Eckstein N, Bates A, Champion A, Du M, Yin Y, Schlegel P Cell. 2024; 187(10):2574-2594.e23.

PMID: 38729112 PMC: 11106717. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016.


References
1.
Doe C, Kuwada J, Goodman C . From epithelium to neuroblasts to neurons: the role of cell interactions and cell lineage during insect neurogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1985; 312(1153):67-81. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1985.0178. View

2.
Heitzler P, Simpson P . The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell. 1991; 64(6):1083-92. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90263-x. View

3.
Jia X, Siegler M . Midline lineages in grasshopper produce neuronal siblings with asymmetric expression of Engrailed. Development. 2002; 129(22):5181-93. DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.22.5181. View

4.
Kondo S, Senoo-Matsuda N, Hiromi Y, Miura M . DRONC coordinates cell death and compensatory proliferation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 26(19):7258-68. PMC: 1592896. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00183-06. View

5.
Larkin M, Holder K, Yost C, Giniger E, Ruohola-Baker H . Expression of constitutively active Notch arrests follicle cells at a precursor stage during Drosophila oogenesis and disrupts the anterior-posterior axis of the oocyte. Development. 1996; 122(11):3639-50. DOI: 10.1242/dev.122.11.3639. View