» Articles » PMID: 20019798

DNA Specificity Determinants Associate with Distinct Transcription Factor Functions

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2009 Dec 19
PMID 20019798
Citations 131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To elucidate how genomic sequences build transcriptional control networks, we need to understand the connection between DNA sequence and transcription factor binding and function. Binding predictions based solely on consensus predictions are limited, because a single factor can use degenerate sequence motifs and because related transcription factors often prefer identical sequences. The ETS family transcription factor, ETS1, exemplifies these challenges. Unexpected, redundant occupancy of ETS1 and other ETS proteins is observed at promoters of housekeeping genes in T cells due to common sequence preferences and the presence of strong consensus motifs. However, ETS1 exhibits a specific function in T cell activation; thus, unique transcriptional targets are predicted. To uncover the sequence motifs that mediate specific functions of ETS1, a genome-wide approach, chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), identified both promoter and enhancer binding events in Jurkat T cells. A comparison with DNase I sensitivity both validated the dataset and also improved accuracy. Redundant occupancy of ETS1 with the ETS protein GABPA occurred primarily in promoters of housekeeping genes, whereas ETS1 specific occupancy occurred in the enhancers of T cell-specific genes. Two routes to ETS1 specificity were identified: an intrinsic preference of ETS1 for a variant of the ETS family consensus sequence and the presence of a composite sequence that can support cooperative binding with a RUNX transcription factor. Genome-wide occupancy of RUNX factors corroborated the importance of this partnership. Furthermore, genome-wide occupancy of co-activator CBP indicated tight co-localization with ETS1 at specific enhancers, but not redundant promoters. The distinct sequences associated with redundant versus specific ETS1 occupancy were predictive of promoter or enhancer location and the ontology of nearby genes. These findings demonstrate that diversity of DNA binding motifs may enable variable transcription factor function at different genomic sites.

Citing Articles

ARID1A mutations protect follicular lymphoma from FAS-dependent immune surveillance by reducing RUNX3/ETS1-driven FAS-expression.

Antoniolli M, Solovey M, Hildebrand J, Freyholdt T, Strobl C, Bararia D Cell Death Differ. 2025; .

PMID: 39843653 DOI: 10.1038/s41418-025-01445-3.


CHD6 eviction of promoter nucleosomes maintains housekeeping transcriptional program in prostate cancer.

Bu L, Huang S, Rao Z, Wu C, Sun B, Liu Y Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024; 35(4):102397.

PMID: 39717618 PMC: 11665337. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102397.


The unique functions of Runx1 in skeletal muscle maintenance and regeneration are facilitated by an ETS interaction domain.

Yu M, Thorner K, Parameswaran S, Wei W, Yu C, Lin X Development. 2024; 151(24).

PMID: 39508441 PMC: 11664167. DOI: 10.1242/dev.202556.


Cis-Regulatory Element and Transcription Factor Circuitry Required for Cell-Type Specific Expression of FOXP3.

Umhoefer J, Arce M, Whalen S, Dajani R, Goudy L, Kasinathan S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282425 PMC: 11398386. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.30.610436.


Rapid profiling of transcription factor-cofactor interaction networks reveals principles of epigenetic regulation.

Inge M, Miller R, Hook H, Bray D, Keenan J, Zhao R Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(17):10276-10296.

PMID: 39166482 PMC: 11417405. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae706.


References
1.
Wang Z, Zang C, Cui K, Schones D, Barski A, Peng W . Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell. 2009; 138(5):1019-31. PMC: 2750862. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.049. View

2.
Bories J, Willerford D, Grevin D, Davidson L, Camus A, MARTIN P . Increased T-cell apoptosis and terminal B-cell differentiation induced by inactivation of the Ets-1 proto-oncogene. Nature. 1995; 377(6550):635-8. DOI: 10.1038/377635a0. View

3.
Meissner A, Mikkelsen T, Gu H, Wernig M, Hanna J, Sivachenko A . Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature. 2008; 454(7205):766-70. PMC: 2896277. DOI: 10.1038/nature07107. View

4.
Yang C, Shapiro L, Rivera M, Kumar A, Brindle P . A role for CREB binding protein and p300 transcriptional coactivators in Ets-1 transactivation functions. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18(4):2218-29. PMC: 121466. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.4.2218. View

5.
Giese K, Kingsley C, Kirshner J, Grosschedl R . Assembly and function of a TCR alpha enhancer complex is dependent on LEF-1-induced DNA bending and multiple protein-protein interactions. Genes Dev. 1995; 9(8):995-1008. DOI: 10.1101/gad.9.8.995. View