» Articles » PMID: 20008508

Large-scale Discovery of Insertion Hotspots and Preferential Integration Sites of Human Transposed Elements

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2009 Dec 17
PMID 20008508
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Throughout evolution, eukaryotic genomes have been invaded by transposable elements (TEs). Little is known about the factors leading to genomic proliferation of TEs, their preferred integration sites and the molecular mechanisms underlying their insertion. We analyzed hundreds of thousands nested TEs in the human genome, i.e. insertions of TEs into existing ones. We first discovered that most TEs insert within specific 'hotspots' along the targeted TE. In particular, retrotransposed Alu elements contain a non-canonical single nucleotide hotspot for insertion of other Alu sequences. We next devised a method for identification of integration sequence motifs of inserted TEs that are conserved within the targeted TEs. This method revealed novel sequences motifs characterizing insertions of various important TE families: Alu, hAT, ERV1 and MaLR. Finally, we performed a global assessment to determine the extent to which young TEs tend to nest within older transposed elements and identified a 4-fold higher tendency of TEs to insert into existing TEs than to insert within non-TE intergenic regions. Our analysis demonstrates that TEs are highly biased to insert within certain TEs, in specific orientations and within specific targeted TE positions. TE nesting events also reveal new characteristics of the molecular mechanisms underlying transposition.

Citing Articles

The Evolution of Widespread Recombination Suppression on the Dwarf Hamster (Phodopus) X Chromosome.

Moore E, Thomas G, Mortimer S, Kopania E, Hunnicutt K, Clare-Salzler Z Genome Biol Evol. 2022; 14(6).

PMID: 35642315 PMC: 9185382. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evac080.


A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements.

Wells J, Feschotte C Annu Rev Genet. 2020; 54:539-561.

PMID: 32955944 PMC: 8293684. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145.


Unraveling epigenomic abnormality in azoospermic human males by WGBS, RNA-Seq, and transcriptome profiling analyses.

Wu X, Luo C, Hu L, Chen X, Chen Y, Fan J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(4):789-802.

PMID: 32056059 PMC: 7183037. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01716-7.


Nested plant LTR retrotransposons target specific regions of other elements, while all LTR retrotransposons often target palindromes and nucleosome-occupied regions: in silico study.

Jedlicka P, Lexa M, Vanat I, Hobza R, Kejnovsky E Mob DNA. 2019; 10:50.

PMID: 31871489 PMC: 6911290. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-019-0186-z.


Phylogenomic analysis reveals splicing as a mechanism of parallel evolution of non-canonical SVAs in hominine primates.

Damert A Mob DNA. 2018; 9:30.

PMID: 30237828 PMC: 6139936. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-018-0135-2.


References
1.
Biemont C, Vieira C . Genetics: junk DNA as an evolutionary force. Nature. 2006; 443(7111):521-4. DOI: 10.1038/443521a. View

2.
van de Lagemaat L, Medstrand P, Mager D . Multiple effects govern endogenous retrovirus survival patterns in human gene introns. Genome Biol. 2006; 7(9):R86. PMC: 1794541. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r86. View

3.
Sela N, Mersch B, Gal-Mark N, Lev-Maor G, Hotz-Wagenblatt A, Ast G . Comparative analysis of transposed element insertion within human and mouse genomes reveals Alu's unique role in shaping the human transcriptome. Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R127. PMC: 2394776. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r127. View

4.
Luan D, Korman M, Jakubczak J, Eickbush T . Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell. 1993; 72(4):595-605. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90078-5. View

5.
Goodier J, Kazazian Jr H . Retrotransposons revisited: the restraint and rehabilitation of parasites. Cell. 2008; 135(1):23-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.022. View