» Articles » PMID: 19949511

Evaluation of an Enhanced Stimulus-stimulus Pairing Procedure to Increase Early Vocalizations of Children with Autism

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2009 Dec 2
PMID 19949511
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence to support stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) in speech acquisition is less than robust, calling into question the ability of SSP to reliably establish automatically reinforcing properties of speech and limiting the procedure's clinical utility for increasing vocalizations. We evaluated the effects of a modified SSP procedure on low-frequency within-session vocalizations that were further strengthened through programmed reinforcement. Procedural modifications (e.g., interspersed paired and unpaired trials) were designed to increase stimulus salience during SSP. All 3 participants, preschoolers with autism, showed differential increases of target over nontarget vocal responses during SSP. Results suggested an automatic reinforcement effect of SSP, although alternative interpretations are discussed, and suggestions are made for future research to determine the utility of SSP as a clinical intervention for speech-delayed children.

Citing Articles

On the Identification and Use of Social versus Nonsocial Reinforcers: A Review of Research Practices.

Morris S, Bridges K Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(4):739-761.

PMID: 39584062 PMC: 11582244. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00426-0.


Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement.

Madden G, Mahmoudi S, Brown K J Appl Behav Anal. 2023; 56(3):498-519.

PMID: 37254881 PMC: 10364091. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1004.


Early intervention for very young children with or at high likelihood for autism spectrum disorder: An overview of reviews.

Franz L, Goodwin C, Rieder A, Matheis M, Damiano D Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022; 64(9):1063-1076.

PMID: 35582893 PMC: 9339513. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15258.


Assessing the Effects of Observational Conditioning and Response-Contingent Pairing on the Vocalizations of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Chance S, Cividini-Motta C, Livingston C Anal Verbal Behav. 2022; 37(2):194-216.

PMID: 35141106 PMC: 8789963. DOI: 10.1007/s40616-021-00157-2.


A Randomized Case Series Approach to Testing Efficacy of Interventions for Minimally Verbal Autistic Children.

Saul J, Norbury C Front Psychol. 2021; 12:621920.

PMID: 34108905 PMC: 8182798. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621920.


References
1.
Esch B, Carr J, Michael J . Evaluating stimulus-stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement in the establishment of an echoic repertoire of children diagnosed with autism. Anal Verbal Behav. 2012; 21:43-58. PMC: 2774102. DOI: 10.1007/BF03393009. View

2.
Normand M, Knoll M . The effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on the unprompted vocalizations of a young child diagnosed with autism. Anal Verbal Behav. 2012; 22:81-5. PMC: 2774600. DOI: 10.1007/BF03393028. View

3.
Carr J, Nicolson A, Higbee T . Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(3):353-7. PMC: 1284262. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353. View

4.
Sautter R, LeBlanc L . Empirical Applications of Skinner's Analysis of Verbal Behavior with Humans. Anal Verbal Behav. 2012; 22:35-48. PMC: 2774593. DOI: 10.1007/BF03393025. View

5.
Porter J, Hodson B . Collaborating to Obtain Phonological Acquisition Data for Local Schools. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001; 32(3):165-171. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/015). View