» Articles » PMID: 19928111

Noise Injection for Training Artificial Neural Networks: a Comparison with Weight Decay and Early Stopping

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2009 Nov 26
PMID 19928111
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a noise injection method on the "overfitting" problem of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in two-class classification tasks. The authors compared ANNs trained with noise injection to ANNs trained with two other methods for avoiding overfitting: weight decay and early stopping. They also evaluated an automatic algorithm for selecting the magnitude of the noise injection. They performed simulation studies of an exclusive-or classification task with training datasets of 50, 100, and 200 cases (half normal and half abnormal) and an independent testing dataset of 2000 cases. They also compared the methods using a breast ultrasound dataset of 1126 cases. For simulated training datasets of 50 cases, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was greater (by 0.03) when training with noise injection than when training without any regularization, and the improvement was greater than those from weight decay and early stopping (both of 0.02). For training datasets of 100 cases, noise injection and weight decay yielded similar increases in the AUC (0.02), whereas early stopping produced a smaller increase (0.01). For training datasets of 200 cases, the increases in the AUC were negligibly small for all methods (0.005). For the ultrasound dataset, noise injection had a greater average AUC than ANNs trained without regularization and a slightly greater average AUC than ANNs trained with weight decay. These results indicate that training ANNs with noise injection can reduce overfitting to a greater degree than early stopping and to a similar degree as weight decay.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning and Metabolomics Predict Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in 2D and 3D Cultures.

Klontzas M, Vernardis S, Batsali A, Papadogiannis F, Panoskaltsis N, Mantalaris A J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(12).

PMID: 39728167 PMC: 11680063. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15120367.


mapping of the chemical exchange relayed nuclear Overhauser effect using deep magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Power I, Rivlin M, Shmuely H, Zaiss M, Navon G, Perlman O iScience. 2024; 27(11):111209.

PMID: 39569380 PMC: 11576397. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111209.


Photonic probabilistic machine learning using quantum vacuum noise.

Choi S, Salamin Y, Roques-Carmes C, Dangovski R, Luo D, Chen Z Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7760.

PMID: 39237543 PMC: 11377531. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51509-0.


DCE-Qnet: deep network quantification of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Cohen O, Kargar S, Woo S, Vargas A, Otazo R MAGMA. 2024; 37(6):1077-1090.

PMID: 39112813 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01189-0.


DCE-Qnet: Deep Network Quantification of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Cohen O, Kargar S, Woo S, Vargas A, Otazo R ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38827459 PMC: 11142325.


References
1.
Chan H, Sahiner B, Wagner R, Petrick N . Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers. Med Phys. 2000; 26(12):2654-68. DOI: 10.1118/1.598805. View

2.
METZ , Pan . "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. J Math Psychol. 1999; 43(1):1-33. DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1218. View

3.
Kupinski M, EDWARDS D, Giger M, Metz C . Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(9):886-99. DOI: 10.1109/42.952727. View

4.
Holmstrom L, Koistinen P . Using additive noise in back-propagation training. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1992; 3(1):24-38. DOI: 10.1109/72.105415. View

5.
Wu Y, Doi K, Metz C, Asada N, Giger M . Simulation studies of data classification by artificial neural networks: potential applications in medical imaging and decision making. J Digit Imaging. 1993; 6(2):117-25. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168438. View