» Articles » PMID: 19912224

Differential Inhibitory Effects of Drugs Acting at the Noradrenaline and 5-hydroxytryptamine Transporters in Rat and Human Neocortical Synaptosomes

Overview
Journal Br J Pharmacol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2009 Nov 17
PMID 19912224
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Although the amino acid sequences of rat and human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) transporters (i.e. SERT and NET) are highly homologous, species differences exist in the inhibitory effects of drugs acting at these transporters. Therefore, comparison of the potencies of drugs acting at SERT and NET in native human and rat neocortex may serve to more accurately predict their clinical profile.

Experimental Approach: Synaptosomes prepared from fresh human and rat neocortical tissues were used for [(3)H]-5-HT and [(3)H]-NA saturation and competition uptake experiments. The drugs tested included NA reuptake inhibitors (desipramine, atomoxetine and (S,S)-reboxetine), 5-HT reuptake blockers (citalopram, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine) and dual 5-HT/NA reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine and milnacipran).

Key Results: In saturation experiments on synaptosomal [(3)H]-5-HT and [(3)H]-NA uptake, the dissociation constants did not indicate species differences although a smaller density of both SERT and NET was observed in human tissues. In competition experiments with the various drugs, marked species differences in their potencies were observed, especially at SERT. The rank order of selectivity ratios (SERT/NET) in human neocortex was as follows: citalopram >or= duloxetine = fluvoxamine >or= fluoxetine > milnacipran > desipramine = atomoxetine > (S,S)-reboxetine. Significant species differences in these ratios were observed for duloxetine, atomoxetine and desipramine.

Conclusions And Implications: This study provides the first compilation of drug potency at native human neocortical SERT and NET. The significant species differences (viz., human vs. rat) in drug potency suggest that the general use of rodent data should be limited to predict clinical efficacy or profile.

Citing Articles

β-Blockers Enhance Inotropy of Endogenous Catecholamines in Chronic Heart Failure.

Feuerstein T, Schlicker E Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:639562.

PMID: 34179127 PMC: 8220816. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.639562.


Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) prevent meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) uptake in platelets without affecting neuroblastoma tumor uptake.

Blom T, Meinsma R, Rutgers M, Buitenhuis C, Dekken-Van den Burg M, van Kuilenburg A EJNMMI Res. 2020; 10(1):78.

PMID: 32642907 PMC: 7343696. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00662-w.


The Impact of Antidepressant Dose and Class on Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

Strawn J, Mills J, Sauley B, Welge J J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018; 57(4):235-244.e2.

PMID: 29588049 PMC: 5877120. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.015.


Long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease with levodopa and other adjunctive drugs.

Mizuno Y, Shimoda S, Origasa H J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017; 125(1):35-43.

PMID: 28091751 PMC: 5754456. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-016-1671-x.


The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety.

Montoya A, Bruins R, Katzman M, Blier P Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016; 12:541-57.

PMID: 27042068 PMC: 4780187. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S91311.


References
1.
Feuerstein T, Limberger N . Mathematical analysis of the control of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic receptors as a supplement to experimental data. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1999; 359(5):345-59. DOI: 10.1007/pl00005361. View

2.
Barker E, Kimmel H, Blakely R . Chimeric human and rat serotonin transporters reveal domains involved in recognition of transporter ligands. Mol Pharmacol. 1994; 46(5):799-807. View

3.
Beique J, Lavoie N, De Montigny C, Debonnel G . Affinities of venlafaxine and various reuptake inhibitors for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporters. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998; 349(1):129-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00241-6. View

4.
Gehlert D, Schober D, Gackenheimer S . Comparison of (R)-[3H]tomoxetine and (R/S)-[3H]nisoxetine binding in rat brain. J Neurochem. 1995; 64(6):2792-800. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64062792.x. View

5.
Plenge P, Mellerup E . [3H]citalopram binding to brain and platelet membranes of human and rat. J Neurochem. 1991; 56(1):248-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb02588.x. View