» Articles » PMID: 19904587

Examining the Relationship Between Genetic Counselors' Attitudes Toward Deaf People and the Genetic Counseling Session

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2009 Nov 12
PMID 19904587
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Given the medical and cultural perspectives on deafness it is important to determine if genetic counselors' attitudes toward deaf people can affect counseling sessions for deafness genes. One hundred fifty-eight genetic counselors recruited through the National Society of Genetic Counselors Listserv completed an online survey assessing attitudes toward deaf people and scenario-specific comfort levels discussing and offering genetic testing for deafness. Respondents with deaf/Deaf friends or who work in prenatal or pediatric settings had more positive attitudes toward deaf people than those without deaf/Deaf friends or those working in 'other' settings. More positive attitudes toward deaf people correlated with higher comfort level talking about genetic testing for the two scenarios involving culturally Deaf clients; and correlated with higher comfort level offering genetic testing to culturally Deaf clients wishing to have a deaf child. Attitudes and comfort level were not correlated in the scenarios involving hearing or non-culturally deaf clients. These results suggest that genetic counselors' attitudes could affect information provision and the decision making process of culturally Deaf clients. Cultural sensitivity workshops in genetic counseling training programs that incorporate personal interactions with culturally Deaf individuals are recommended. Additional suggestions for fostering personal interactions are provided.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Deaf Patients Among Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia: 2020-2021.

Alamro N, Alsahil S, Alhaqbani R, Alburaykan N, Alali N Cureus. 2024; 15(11):e49655.

PMID: 38161849 PMC: 10755641. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49655.


Sensitivity to Deaf Culture Among Otolaryngology and Audiology Trainees.

Epstein S, Johnson L, Sie K, Norton S, Ou H, Horn D Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022; 132(6):648-656.

PMID: 35822616 PMC: 10164444. DOI: 10.1177/00034894221111248.


The Experience of Genetic Counselors Working with Patients Facing the Decision of Pregnancy Termination after 24 Weeks Gestation.

Graziani R, Nemzer L, Kerns J J Genet Couns. 2017; 27(3):626-634.

PMID: 28956221 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0151-2.


A Qualitative Look into Israeli Genetic Experts' Insights Regarding Culturally Competent Genetic Counseling and Recommendations for Its Enhancement.

Siani M, Ben-Zvi Assaraf O J Genet Couns. 2017; 26(6):1254-1269.

PMID: 28444536 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0104-9.


Assessing deaf awareness training: knowledge and attitudes of recent genetic counseling graduates.

Nagakura H, Schneider G, Morris J, Lafferty K, Palmer C J Genet Couns. 2014; 24(1):104-16.

PMID: 25030269 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9742-3.


References
1.
Guillemin M, Gillam L . Attitudes to genetic testing for deafness: the importance of informed choice. J Genet Couns. 2006; 15(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-9003-6. View

2.
Middleton A, Hewison J, MUELLER R . Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 63(4):1175-80. PMC: 1377492. DOI: 10.1086/302060. View

3.
Kenneson A, Braun K, Boyle C . GJB2 (connexin 26) variants and nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss: a HuGE review. Genet Med. 2002; 4(4):258-74. DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200207000-00004. View

4.
Christiansen J . Sociological implications of hearing loss. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991; 630:230-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb19592.x. View

5.
Brunger J, MURRAY G, ORiordan M, Matthews A, Smith R, Robin N . Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 67(6):1621-5. PMC: 1287942. DOI: 10.1086/316901. View