» Articles » PMID: 35822616

Sensitivity to Deaf Culture Among Otolaryngology and Audiology Trainees

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 13
PMID 35822616
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The Deaf community is an ethnolinguistic minority group. Low sensitivity to Deaf culture contributes to health disparities among Deaf patients. This study determines the level of sensitivity to Deaf culture among otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) and audiology trainees.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey study of OHNS and audiology trainees from 10 large US institutions. Trainees were queried on their exposure to and comfort with Deaf patients and their education on, attitude toward, and awareness and knowledge of Deaf culture. Sensitivity to Deaf culture was operationalized as awareness and knowledge of Deaf culture. These were assessed using a 35-item instrument that was previously developed using a d/Deaf community-based participatory approach to research. We used T-tests to compare the sample to previous samples of medical students with training in Deaf culture (MS-TDCs) and general practitioners (GPs).

Results: There were 91 completed surveys (response rate 44.5%). Almost all were aware of Deaf culture (97.8%). The mean knowledge score was 55.0% (standard deviation (SD) 13.4%), which was significantly higher than that for GPs at 43.0% (SD 15.0%) (95% confidence interval 8.1%, 15.8%,  < .0001) but significantly lower than that for MS-TDCs at 69.0% (SD 13.0%)(CI -20.3%, -7.6%,  < .0001). Knowledge scores were comparable for OHNS and audiology trainees ( = .09).

Conclusion: This sample of OHNS and audiology trainees was more sensitive to Deaf culture than GPs but less sensitive than MS-TDCs. Developing specialty-specific education may be warranted.

Level Of Evidence: 4.

Citing Articles

Developing a mobile application for gender-affirming voice training: A community-engaged approach.

Alter I, Chadwick K, Andreadis K, Coleman R, Pitti M, Ezell J Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024; 9(6):e70043.

PMID: 39679168 PMC: 11645500. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70043.


Deaf culture awareness among physicians and advanced practice providers in the emergency department: A multicenter study.

Johnson L, Schmitz S, Dillon K, Mudrick E, Kumar S, Jones C AEM Educ Train. 2024; 8(6):e11050.

PMID: 39669182 PMC: 11632535. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11050.


Types of sensory disability are differentially associated with mental health in older US adults over time.

Wang A, Wroblewski K, Hawkley L, Pinto J J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024; 72(9):2770-2781.

PMID: 38944677 PMC: 11368610. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19056.

References
1.
Pass L, Graber A . Informed Consent, Deaf Culture, and Cochlear Implants. J Clin Ethics. 2015; 26(3):219-30. View

2.
Lapinski J, Colonna C, Sexton P, Richard M . American sign language and deaf culture competency of osteopathic medical students. Am Ann Deaf. 2015; 160(1):36-47. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2015.0014. View

3.
Peterson P, Quarstein V . Disability awareness training for disability professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2001; 23(1):43-8. DOI: 10.1080/09638280150211293. View

4.
Chang P . Breaking the sound barrier: exploring parents' decision-making process of cochlear implants for their children. Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 100(8):1544-1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.005. View

5.
Kuenburg A, Fellinger P, Fellinger J . Health Care Access Among Deaf People. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015; 21(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/env042. View