» Articles » PMID: 19898909

Physician Preferences for Elements of Effective Consultations

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2009 Nov 10
PMID 19898909
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Effective communication is vital for optimal medical consultation, but there is little current information about physician preferences for effective consultation.

Methods: We invited physicians with at least one post-graduate year of experience at four Minnesota teaching hospitals to complete a 16-question Internet questionnaire about inpatient consultations.

Results: E-mail requests were received by an estimated 651 physicians. Questionnaires were completed by 323 (50%). Of these, 54% had completed training >5 years before, 17% had completed training <5 years before, and 30% were residents or fellows. Three elements were considered essential in consultation requests by most respondents: the specific question to be addressed (94%), whom to call with the response (68%), and consultation urgency (66%). In the consultation note, 71% of subjects placed high importance on simple, concise recommendations and 64% on the rationale behind them, while only 7% placed high importance on citing references. Most (69%) preferred that assessments and recommendations be written in bulleted or numbered format. A plurality (48%) preferred that assessments and recommendations be separated. Most placed high value on recommendations regarding drug therapy that specify dose (80%), duration (80%), and generic medication name (62%). Requesters placed greater importance than consultants (87% vs. 65%, respectively, P = 0.004) on recommendations that included duration of therapy. The majority (63%) stated that telephone requests were needed for emergent or urgent consultations. Those who usually requested consultations were more likely than those who usually responded to consultation requests to prefer telephone requests for routine consultations (43% vs. 20%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Physicians agreed on many essential elements for effective consultations. These results should guide efforts to improve communication in the consultation process and design electronic medical record systems.

Citing Articles

Validation of Quality Assessment Measures for Inpatient Gastroenterology Consults on Oncologic Patients in Non-teaching Services at a Cancer Center: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kidambi T, Qadri R, Varughese J, Seto T, Idos G, Lin J Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 69(9):3165-3171.

PMID: 39068381 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08571-x.


Collaboration Between Physicians from Different Medical Specialties in Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.

Braam A, Buljac-Samardzic M, Hilders C, van Wijngaarden J J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:2277-2300.

PMID: 36237842 PMC: 9552793. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S376927.


Essential consultants' skills and attitudes (Willing CONSULT): a cross-sectional survey.

Matsuo T, Hayashi K, Uehara Y, Mori N BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1):366.

PMID: 34217282 PMC: 8254944. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02810-9.


Availability, timeliness, documentation and quality of consultations among hospital departments: a prospective, comparative study.

Jarjoui A, Mendlovic J, Dadon Z, Abu Sneineh M, Tabi M, Kalak G Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021; 10(1):19.

PMID: 33866967 PMC: 8053423. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-021-00446-0.


Evaluation of an Interprofessional Learning Experience for Telephone Consultations.

Cunningham S, Musick D, Trinkle D Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021; 12:215-225.

PMID: 33688295 PMC: 7937369. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S293735.


References
1.
Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P . Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 77(5):291-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. View

2.
Byrd J, Moskowitz M . Outpatient consultation: interaction between the general internist and the specialist. J Gen Intern Med. 1987; 2(2):93-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02596304. View

3.
Conley J, Jordan M, Ghali W . Audit of the consultation process on general internal medicine services. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18(1):59-62. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025486. View

4.
Landrigan C, Czeisler C, Barger L, Ayas N, Rothschild J, Lockley S . Effective implementation of work-hour limits and systemic improvements. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 33(11 Suppl):19-29. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33110-3. View

5.
Lo E, Rezai K, Evans A, Madariaga M, Phillips M, Brobbey W . Why don't they listen? Adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38(9):1212-8. DOI: 10.1086/383315. View