Keys to Success of a Community of Clinical Practice in Primary Care: a Qualitative Evaluation of the ECOPIH Project

Overview

Journal BMC Fam Pract

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2018 May 11

PMID 29743030

Citations 12

Authors

David Lacasta Tintorer

Josep Maria Manresa Dominguez

Enriqueta Pujol-Rivera

Souhel Flayeh Beneyto

Xavier Mundet Tuduri

Francesc Saigi-Rubio

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The current reality of primary care (PC) makes it essential to have telemedicine systems available to facilitate communication between care levels. Communities of practice have great potential in terms of care and education, and that is why the Online Communication Tool between Primary and Hospital Care was created. This tool enables PC and non-GP specialist care (SC) professionals to raise clinical cases for consultation and to share information. The objective of this article is to explore healthcare professionals' views on communities of clinical practice (CoCPs) and the changes that need to be made in an uncontrolled real-life setting after more than two years of use.

Methods: A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted on a total of 29 healthcare professionals who were users and non-users of a CoCP using 2 focus groups, 3 triangular groups and 5 individual interviews. There were 18 women, 21 physicians and 8 nurses. Of the interviewees, 21 were PC professionals, 24 were users of a CoCP and 7 held managerial positions.

Results: For a system of communication between PC and SC to become a tool that is habitually used and very useful, the interviewees considered that it would have to be able to find quick, effective solutions to the queries raised, based on up-to-date information that is directly applicable to daily clinical practice. Contact should be virtual - and probably collaborative - via a platform integrated into their habitual workstations and led by PC professionals. Organisational changes should be implemented to enable users to have more time in their working day to spend on the tool, and professionals should have a proactive attitude in order to make the most if its potential. It is also important to make certain technological changes, basically aimed at improving the tool's accessibility, by integrating it into habitual clinical workstations.

Conclusions: The collaborative tool that provides reliable, up-to-date information that is highly transferrable to clinical practice is valued for its effectiveness, efficiency and educational capacity. In order to make the most of its potential in terms of care and education, organisational changes and techniques are required to foster greater use.

Citing Articles

The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.

Keuper J, van Tuyl L, de Geit E, Rijpkema C, Vis E, Batenburg R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1099.

PMID: 39300456 PMC: 11414290. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.

The aims and effectiveness of communities of practice in healthcare: A systematic review.

Noar A, Jeffery H, Subbiah Ponniah H, Jaffer U PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292343.

PMID: 37815986 PMC: 10564133. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292343.

Teleconsultation adoption since COVID-19: Comparison of barriers and facilitators in primary care settings in Hong Kong and the Netherlands.

Fernandez Coves A, Yeung K, van der Putten I, Nelson E Health Policy. 2022; 126(10):933-944.

PMID: 36050194 PMC: 9356914. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.012.

Collaborative Learning: A Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Contributing to a Successful Tobacco Cessation Train-the-Trainer Program as a Community of Practice.

Martinez Leal I, Martinez J, Britton M, Chen T, Correa-Fernandez V, Kyburz B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805323 PMC: 9266255. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137664.

Assessing Determinants of Online Medical Services Adoption Willingness of General Hospital Physicians Using the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Peng X, Li Z, Zhang C, Wu Q, Gu J, You H J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 14:3453-3462.

PMID: 34992374 PMC: 8710087. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S346675.

References

Straus S, Chen A, Yee Jr H, Kushel M, Bell D . Implementation of an electronic referral system for outpatient specialty care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2011:1337-46. PMC: 3243286. View

Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S . Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (3):CD000072. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2. View

Coumou H, Meijman F . How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006; 94(1):55-60. PMC: 1324772. View

Hennink M, Kaiser B, Marconi V . Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?. Qual Health Res. 2016; 27(4):591-608. PMC: 9359070. DOI: 10.1177/1049732316665344. View

Carlsen B, Glenton C . What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11:26. PMC: 3061958. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-26. View

Greenhalgh T, Russell J . Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(11):e1000360. PMC: 2970573. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000360. View

Mahtani Chugani V, Martin Fernandez R, Soto Pedre E, Yanes Lopez V, Serrano Aguilar P . [Implementation of telemedicine programs in Spain: experience of the main actors involved in the decision-making process]. Gac Sanit. 2009; 23(3):223.e223-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.06.005. View

Kim Y, Chen A, Keith E, Yee Jr H, Kushel M . Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24(5):614-9. PMC: 2669877. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. View

Cain J, Policastri A . Using Facebook as an informal learning environment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012; 75(10):207. PMC: 3279026. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7510207. View

10.

Cook D, Sorensen K, Wilkinson J, Berger R . Barriers and decisions when answering clinical questions at the point of care: a grounded theory study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(21):1962-9. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10103. View

11.

Norman G, Schmidt H . Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ. 2000; 34(9):721-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00749.x. View

12.

Grant R, Ashburner J, Hong C, Hong C, Chang Y, Barry M . Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician's perspective: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(12):797-804. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00001. View

13.

Li L, Grimshaw J, Nielsen C, Judd M, Coyte P, Graham I . Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:27. PMC: 2694761. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-27. View

14.

David I, Poissant L, Rochette A . Clinicians' expectations of Web 2.0 as a mechanism for knowledge transfer of stroke best practices. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(5):e121. PMC: 3510686. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2016. View

15.

. Social networking and the medical practice. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2010; 103(10):517-26. View

16.

Pereles L, Lockyer J, Fidler H . Permanent small groups: group dynamics, learning, and change. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003; 22(4):205-13. DOI: 10.1002/chp.1340220404. View

17.

Tuckett A . Qualitative research sampling: the very real complexities. Nurse Res. 2004; 12(1):47-61. DOI: 10.7748/nr2004.07.12.1.47.c5930. View

18.

Soubhi H, Colet N, Gilbert J, Lebel P, Thivierge R, Hudon C . Interprofessional learning in the trenches: fostering collective capability. J Interprof Care. 2009; 23(1):52-7. DOI: 10.1080/13561820802565619. View

19.

Barnett S, Jones S, Caton T, Iverson D, Bennett S, Robinson L . Implementing a virtual community of practice for family physician training: a mixed-methods case study. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(3):e83. PMC: 3967123. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3083. View

20.

Barnett S, Jones S, Bennett S, Iverson D, Bonney A . Perceptions of family physician trainees and trainers regarding the usefulness of a virtual community of practice. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(5):e92. PMC: 3650926. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2555. View