» Articles » PMID: 19861330

An Experimental Protocol for Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal Boys Recently Diagnosed with Cancer: a Report of Acceptability and Safety

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2009 Oct 29
PMID 19861330
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gonadal damage is a consequence of therapy for pediatric malignancies. Prepubertal males have no semen or mature spermatozoa, posing a challenge for fertility preservation. Testicular tissue cryopreservation is a potential option but is still experimental. We report on a pilot protocol that offered testicular biopsy cryopreservation to families of prepubertal boys with newly diagnosed malignancy. The aims were to determine the acceptability and safety of this procedure.

Methods: Parents of prepubertal boys with diagnoses at highest risk for treatment-related gonadal damage were offered the option of testicular cryopreservation. Half of the biopsy was frozen for the subject's potential future use and the remainder used for research. Data on negative intraoperative and/or 7 day post-operative sequelae of testicular biopsies were assessed. Two to four weeks later, parents were asked to complete a questionnaire on factors influencing their decision to have the biopsy or not.

Results: Since January 2008, 24 boys have met the eligibility criteria but three required immediate treatment and were excluded. Sixteen of 21 families (76%) consented to testicular biopsy, indicating the prospective acceptability of this option to parents of boys aged 3 months to 14 years; 14 underwent the procedure without any negative intra- or post-operative sequelae. Although the time at diagnosis is stressful, families can give thoughtful consideration to this option. Factors such as religion, finance, ethics and the experimental nature of cryopreservation did not play a major role in decision-making.

Conclusions: Parents of prepubertal boys with cancer are willing to pursue testicular tissue cryopreservation at diagnosis, and testicular biopsy caused no acute adverse effects.

Citing Articles

"Management of andrological disorders from childhood and adolescence to transition age: guidelines from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) in collaboration with the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and....

Bonomi M, Cangiano B, Cianfarani S, Garolla A, Gianfrilli D, Lanfranco F J Endocrinol Invest. 2024; 48(1):1-22.

PMID: 39126560 PMC: 11729124. DOI: 10.1007/s40618-024-02435-x.


Testis tissue cryopreservation may be considered in boys with cryptorchidism.

Mamsen L, Hildorf S, Ntemou E, Wang D, Cortes D, Fedder J Asian J Androl. 2024; 26(6):610-616.

PMID: 39075793 PMC: 11614173. DOI: 10.4103/aja202437.


Advancements in fertility preservation strategies for pediatric male cancer patients: a review of cryopreservation and transplantation of immature testicular tissue.

Sung Z, Liao Y, Hou J, Lai H, Weng S, Jao H Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):47.

PMID: 38637872 PMC: 11025181. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01219-5.


Preservation of fertility in female and male prepubertal patients diagnosed with cancer.

Albamonte M, Vitullo A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(12):2755-2767.

PMID: 37770817 PMC: 10656407. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02945-2.


Fertility preservation in pediatric healthcare: a review.

Chen L, Dong Z, Chen X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1147898.

PMID: 37206440 PMC: 10189781. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1147898.


References
1.
Wallace W, Anderson R, Irvine D . Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(4):209-18. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70092-9. View

2.
Rivkees S, Crawford J . The relationship of gonadal activity and chemotherapy-induced gonadal damage. JAMA. 1988; 259(14):2123-5. View

3.
Howell S, Shalet S . Testicular function following chemotherapy. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7(4):363-9. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/7.4.363. View

4.
Schover L, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz L, Jeha S . Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(7):1880-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.175. View

5.
Bath L, Wallace W, Critchley H . Late effects of the treatment of childhood cancer on the female reproductive system and the potential for fertility preservation. BJOG. 2002; 109(2):107-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01007.x. View