» Articles » PMID: 19806284

Hip Protectors: Recommendations for Conducting Clinical Trials--an International Consensus Statement (part II)

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2009 Oct 7
PMID 19806284
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: While hip protectors are effective in some clinical trials, many, including all in community settings, have been unable to demonstrate effectiveness. This is due partly to differences in the design and analysis. The aim of this report is to develop recommendations for subsequent clinical research.

Methods: In November of 2007, the International Hip Protector Research Group met to address barriers to the clinical effectiveness of hip protectors. This paper represents a consensus statement from the group on recommended methods for conducting future clinical trials of hip protectors.

Results And Conclusions: Consensus recommendations include the following: the use of a hip protector that has undergone adequate biomechanical testing, the use of sham hip protectors, the conduct of clinical trials in populations with annual hip fracture incidence of at least 3%, a run-in period with demonstration of adequate adherence, surveillance of falls and adherence, and the inclusion of economic analyses. Larger and more costly clinical trials are required to definitively investigate effectiveness of hip protectors.

Citing Articles

Vitamin D and hip protectors in osteosarcopenia: a combined hip fracture preventing approach.

Giustina A, Giustina A Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2024; 26(1):1-18.

PMID: 39352578 PMC: 11790758. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-024-09907-8.


Does hip protector prevent falls and hip fractures? An umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Da Q, Xiao Y, Wu F, Chen Y, Li L BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):514.

PMID: 38867191 PMC: 11170778. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05122-x.


Potential Solutions for the Mitigation of Hip Injuries Caused by Falls in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.

Tarbert R, Zhou J, Manor B J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022; 78(5):853-860.

PMID: 36194471 PMC: 10172985. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glac211.


Protocol for the SAFEST review: the Shock-Absorbing Flooring Effectiveness SysTematic review including older adults and staff in hospitals and care homes.

Drahota A, Felix L, Keenan B, Lachance C, Laing A, Mackey D BMJ Open. 2020; 10(2):e032315.

PMID: 32071174 PMC: 7044972. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032315.


Hip protectors are cost-effective in the prevention of hip fractures in patients with high fracture risk.

de Bot R, Veldman H, Witlox A, van Rhijn L, Hiligsmann M Osteoporos Int. 2020; 31(7):1217-1229.

PMID: 32040600 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05252-8.


References
1.
van Schoor N, van der Veen A, Schaap L, Smit T, Lips P . Biomechanical comparison of hard and soft hip protectors, and the influence of soft tissue. Bone. 2006; 39(2):401-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.01.156. View

2.
Barton B, Birge S, Magaziner J, Zimmerman S, Ball L, Brown K . The Hip Impact Protection Project: design and methods. Clin Trials. 2008; 5(4):347-55. PMC: 3725461. DOI: 10.1177/1740774508095120. View

3.
Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357(9263):1191-4. View

4.
Lauritzen J, Petersen M, Lund B . Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures. Lancet. 1993; 341(8836):11-3. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92480-h. View

5.
Koike T, Orito Y, Toyoda H, Tada M, Sugama R, Hoshino M . External hip protectors are effective for the elderly with higher-than-average risk factors for hip fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 20(9):1613-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0824-7. View