» Articles » PMID: 30941484

Biomechanical Testing of Hip Protectors Following the Canadian Standards Association Express Document

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2019 Apr 4
PMID 30941484
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Each year, over 70,000 patients are admitted to hospital in the UK with hip fractures. There are a variety of commercial hip protectors currently available. However, it is not explicitly clear which is the most effective with regard to maximum force attenuation, whilst still being both comfortable for the user and providing reasonable force reduction if misplaced from the intended position. The numerous test methods reported in the literature have given conflicting results, making objective comparison difficult for users, researchers, and manufacturers alike. The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) has therefore published an express document (EXP-08-17) with a draft standard test method. This paper presents initial results for a range of hip protectors.

Methods: Eighteen commercially available hip protectors were tested according to EXP-08-17. Each hip protector was impacted five times in correct anatomical alignment over the greater trochanter and once at 50 mm displacements in the anterior, posterior, and lateral directions.

Results: Considerable differences were identified between individual hip protectors in their ability to reduce impact forces on the femur (between 3% and 36% reduction in peak force). The performance was reduced when misplaced in many cases (maximum reduction only 20%).

Conclusions: This is the first study that uses a standard mechanical test on hip protectors. Previous studies have used a variety of methods, making it difficult to interpret results. We hope that these results using a standard test method will facilitate the effective comparison of results, as well as providing useful data for clinicians, users, and purchasers.

Citing Articles

Vitamin D and hip protectors in osteosarcopenia: a combined hip fracture preventing approach.

Giustina A, Giustina A Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2024; 26(1):1-18.

PMID: 39352578 PMC: 11790758. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-024-09907-8.


Does hip protector prevent falls and hip fractures? An umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Da Q, Xiao Y, Wu F, Chen Y, Li L BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):514.

PMID: 38867191 PMC: 11170778. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05122-x.


Impact forces in backward falls: Subject-specific video-based rigid body simulation of backward falls.

Khorami F, Obaid N, Bhatnagar T, Ayoub A, Robinovitch S, Sparrey C Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2023; 237(11):1275-1286.

PMID: 37969107 PMC: 10685694. DOI: 10.1177/09544119231207653.


The Influence of Fall Direction and Hip Protector on Fracture Risk: FE Model Predictions Driven by Experimental Data.

Galliker E, Laing A, Ferguson S, Helgason B, Fleps I Ann Biomed Eng. 2022; 50(3):278-290.

PMID: 35129719 PMC: 8847295. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02917-0.


A Description of Novel Uses of Hip Protectors in an Elderly Hip Fracture Population: A Technical Report.

Nolan P, Tiedt L, Ellanti P, McCarthy T Cureus. 2022; 14(1):e21028.

PMID: 35028242 PMC: 8747993. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21028.

References
1.
Nevitt M, Cummings S . Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993; 41(11):1226-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07307.x. View

2.
Kannus P, Leiponen P, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Jarvinen M . A sideways fall and hip fracture. Bone. 2006; 39(2):383-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.01.148. View

3.
Parkkari J, Kannus P, Palvanen M, Natri A, Vainio J, Aho H . Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999; 65(3):183-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002239900679. View

4.
Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A . Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone. 2000; 27(5):585-90. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00381-1. View

5.
Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J . Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations.... Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:136. PMC: 3880487. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. View