» Articles » PMID: 19722517

Simultaneous Separation of Negatively and Positively Charged Species in Dynamic Field Gradient Focusing Using a Dual Polarity Electric Field

Overview
Journal Anal Chem
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2009 Sep 3
PMID 19722517
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dynamic field gradient focusing (DFGF) utilizes an electric field gradient established by a computer-controlled electrode array to separate and concentrate charged analytes at unique axial positions. Traditionally, DFGF has been restricted to the analysis of negatively charged species due to limitations in the software of our voltage controller. This paper introduces a new voltage controller capable of operating under normal polarity (positive potentials applied to the electrode array) and reversed polarity (negative potentials applied to the electrode array) for the separation of negatively and positively charged analytes, respectively. The experiments conducted under normal polarity and reversed polarity illustrate the utility of the new controller to perform reproducible DFGF separations (elution times showing less than 1% run-to-run variation) over a wide pH range (3.08 to 8.5) regardless of the protein charge. A dual polarity experiment is then shown in which the separation channel has been divided into normal polarity and reversed polarity regions. This simultaneous separation of negatively charged R-phycoerythrin (R-PE) and positively charged cytochrome c (CYTC) within the same DFGF apparatus is shown.

Citing Articles

Focusing, sorting, and separating microplastics by serial faradaic ion concentration polarization.

Davies C, Crooks R Chem Sci. 2020; 11(21):5547-5558.

PMID: 32874498 PMC: 7441690. DOI: 10.1039/d0sc01931c.


Structural Analysis of Biomolecules through a Combination of Mobility Capillary Electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry.

He M, Luo P, Hong J, Wang X, Wu H, Zhang R ACS Omega. 2019; 4(1):2377-2386.

PMID: 31459477 PMC: 6648644. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03224.


Using electrophoretic exclusion to manipulate small molecules and particles on a microdevice.

Kenyon S, Weiss N, Hayes M Electrophoresis. 2012; 33(8):1227-35.

PMID: 22589099 PMC: 3810277. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201100622.


Development of a membrane-less dynamic field gradient focusing device for the separation of low-molecular-weight molecules.

Burke J, Smith C, Ivory C Electrophoresis. 2010; 31(5):902-9.

PMID: 20191553 PMC: 2919354. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900589.

References
1.
Petsev D, Lopez G, Ivory C, Sibbett S . Microchannel protein separation by electric field gradient focusing. Lab Chip. 2005; 5(6):587-97. DOI: 10.1039/b501538c. View

2.
Tunon P, Wang Y, Myers P, Bartle K, Bowhill L, Ivory C . Electrophoretic field gradient focusing: an investigation of the experimental parameters. Electrophoresis. 2007; 29(2):457-65. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200700443. View

3.
Lin S, Li Y, Tolley H, Humble P, Lee M . Tandem electric field gradient focusing system for isolation and concentration of target proteins. J Chromatogr A. 2006; 1125(2):254-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.041. View

4.
Matsui T, Franzke J, Manz A, Janasek D . Temperature gradient focusing in a PDMS/glass hybrid microfluidic chip. Electrophoresis. 2007; 28(24):4606-11. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200700272. View

5.
Mandell J . Phosphorylation state-specific antibodies: applications in investigative and diagnostic pathology. Am J Pathol. 2003; 163(5):1687-98. PMC: 1892416. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63525-0. View