» Articles » PMID: 19679871

Impaired Color Word Processing at an Unattended Location: Evidence from a Stroop Task Combined with Inhibition of Return

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2009 Aug 15
PMID 19679871
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A Stroop task with separate color bar and color word stimuli was combined with an inhibition-of-return procedure to examine whether visual attention modulates color word processing. In Experiment 1, the color bar was presented at the cued location and the color word at the uncued location, or vice versa, with a 100- or 1,050-msec stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between cue and Stroop stimuli. In Experiment 2, on Stroop trials, the color bar was presented at a central fixated location and the color word at a cued or uncued location above or below the color bar. In both experiments, with a 100-msec SOA, the Stroop effect was numerically larger when the color word was displayed at the cued location than when it was displayed at the uncued location, but with the 1,050-msec SOA, this relation between Stroop effect magnitude and location was reversed. These results provide evidence that processing of the color word in the Stroop task is modulated by the location to which visual attention is directed.

Citing Articles

The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Caldas A, Machado-Pinheiro W, Daneyko O, Riggio L Psychol Res. 2019; 84(7):1815-1828.

PMID: 31030272 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01191-5.

References
1.
Cho Y, Lien M, Proctor R . Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(4):826-39. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.826. View

2.
Simon J . Reactions toward the source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol. 1969; 81(1):174-6. DOI: 10.1037/h0027448. View

3.
Moors A, De Houwer J . Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(2):297-326. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297. View

4.
Lachter J, Ruthruff E, Lien M, McCann R . Is attention needed for word identification? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008; 15(5):950-5. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.950. View

5.
Yee P, Hunt E . Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991; 17(3):715-25. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.715. View