» Articles » PMID: 18926987

Is Attention Needed for Word Identification? Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2008 Oct 18
PMID 18926987
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the most robust findings in attention research is that the time to name a color is lengthened markedly in the presence of an irrelevant word that spells a different color name: the Stroop effect. The Stroop effect is found even when the word is physically separated from the color, apparently indicating that words can be read outside the focus of spatial attention. The present study critically evaluated this claim. We employed several stringent measures within a Stroop paradigm to prevent participants from attending to the irrelevant words (e.g., limiting exposure duration to prevent attention capture). Nonetheless, residual Stroop effects were obtained for both color words and semantic associates (e.g., sky to blue). These data suggest that lexical processing can sometimes occur outside the focus of spatial attention.

Citing Articles

Linguistic and attentional factors - Not statistical regularities - Contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms.

Lochy A, Rossion B, Lambon Ralph M, Volfart A, Hauk O, Schiltz C Cortex. 2024; 173:339-354.

PMID: 38479348 PMC: 10988773. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.01.007.


Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Hubbard R, Federmeier K Brain Res. 2021; 1764:147466.

PMID: 33861998 PMC: 8491584. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147466.


Multiple routes to word recognition: evidence from event-related potentials.

Lien M, Allen P, Ruthruff E Psychol Res. 2019; 85(1):151-180.

PMID: 31624919 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01256-5.


Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.

Robidoux S, Besner D Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 22(6):1709-16.

PMID: 25862427 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0830-7.


Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.

Labuschagne E, Besner D Front Psychol. 2015; 6:117.

PMID: 25713553 PMC: 4322538. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00117.


References
1.
Brown T, Carr T . Automaticity and word perception: evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995; 21(6):1395-411. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.6.1395. View

2.
Posner M, Snyder C, Davidson B . Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol. 1980; 109(2):160-74. View

3.
Cho Y, Lien M, Proctor R . Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(4):826-39. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.826. View

4.
Fera P, Jolicoeur P, Besner D . Evidence against early selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(2):259-75. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.259. View

5.
Brown T, Gore C, Carr T . Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002; 131(2):220-40. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.2.220. View