Distinct Visual Working Memory Systems for View-dependent and View-invariant Representation

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2009 Aug 12

PMID 19668380

Citations 7

Authors

Justin N Wood

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: How do people sustain a visual representation of the environment? Currently, many researchers argue that a single visual working memory system sustains non-spatial object information such as colors and shapes. However, previous studies tested visual working memory for two-dimensional objects only. In consequence, the nature of visual working memory for three-dimensional (3D) object representation remains unknown.

Methodology/principal Findings: Here, I show that when sustaining information about 3D objects, visual working memory clearly divides into two separate, specialized memory systems, rather than one system, as was previously thought. One memory system gradually accumulates sensory information, forming an increasingly precise view-dependent representation of the scene over the course of several seconds. A second memory system sustains view-invariant representations of 3D objects. The view-dependent memory system has a storage capacity of 3-4 representations and the view-invariant memory system has a storage capacity of 1-2 representations. These systems can operate independently from one another and do not compete for working memory storage resources.

Conclusions/significance: These results provide evidence that visual working memory sustains object information in two separate, specialized memory systems. One memory system sustains view-dependent representations of the scene, akin to the view-specific representations that guide place recognition during navigation in humans, rodents and insects. The second memory system sustains view-invariant representations of 3D objects, akin to the object-based representations that underlie object cognition.

Citing Articles

Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Memory for Body Parts: A Virtual Reality Study.

Serino S, Di Lernia D, Magni G, Manenti P, De Gasperi S, Riva G J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):33.

PMID: 38638460 PMC: 11025578. DOI: 10.5334/joc.357.

How are patterned movements stored in working memory?.

Li C, Tian W, He Y, Wang C, Wang X, Xu X Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1074520.

PMID: 36874799 PMC: 9982134. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074520.

Visual working memory for connected 3D objects: effects of stimulus complexity, dimensionality and connectivity.

He C, Gunalp P, Meyerhoff H, Rathbun Z, Stieff M, Franconeri S Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022; 7(1):19.

PMID: 35182236 PMC: 8857738. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00367-9.

Memory guidance of value-based decision making at an abstract level of representation.

Liashenko A, Dizaji A, Melloni L, Schwiedrzik C Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21496.

PMID: 33299077 PMC: 7726557. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78460-6.

Stable Encoding of Visual Cues in the Mouse Retrosplenial Cortex.

Powell A, Connelly W, Vasalauskaite A, Nelson A, Vann S, Aggleton J Cereb Cortex. 2020; 30(8):4424-4437.

PMID: 32147692 PMC: 7438634. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa030.

References

Trullier O, Wiener S, Berthoz A, Meyer J . Biologically based artificial navigation systems: review and prospects. Prog Neurobiol. 1997; 51(5):483-544. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00060-3. View

Collett M, Collett T . How do insects use path integration for their navigation?. Biol Cybern. 2000; 83(3):245-59. DOI: 10.1007/s004220000168. View

Cheng K . Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(9):355-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.004. View

Kourtzi Z, Erb M, Grodd W, Bulthoff H . Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13(9):911-20. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/13.9.911. View

Luck S, Vogel E . The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature. 1997; 390(6657):279-81. DOI: 10.1038/36846. View

Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N . Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science. 2001; 293(5534):1506-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1061133. View

Morey C, Cowan N . When visual and verbal memories compete: evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(2):296-301. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196573. View

Zhang W, Luck S . Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature. 2008; 453(7192):233-5. PMC: 2588137. DOI: 10.1038/nature06860. View

Gillner S, Weiss A, Mallot H . Visual homing in the absence of feature-based landmark information. Cognition. 2008; 109(1):105-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.018. View

10.

Rouder J, Morey R, Cowan N, Zwilling C, Morey C, Pratte M . An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(16):5975-9. PMC: 2329704. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711295105. View

11.

Carey S, Williams T . The role of object recognition in young infants' object segregation. J Exp Child Psychol. 2001; 78(1):55-60; discussion 98-106. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2603. View

12.

Awh E, Barton B, Vogel E . Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(7):622-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01949.x. View

13.

Kallai J, Makany T, Csatho A, Karadi K, Horvath D, Kovacs-Labadi B . Cognitive and affective aspects of thigmotaxis strategy in humans. Behav Neurosci. 2007; 121(1):21-30. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.1.21. View

14.

Harrison S, Tong F . Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature. 2009; 458(7238):632-5. PMC: 2709809. DOI: 10.1038/nature07832. View

15.

Brady T, Konkle T, Alvarez G, Oliva A . Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(38):14325-9. PMC: 2533687. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105. View

16.

Alvarez G, Cavanagh P . The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(2):106-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x. View

17.

Xu Y, Chun M . Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature. 2005; 440(7080):91-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature04262. View

18.

Biederman I . Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev. 1987; 94(2):115-147. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115. View

19.

Serences J, Ester E, Vogel E, Awh E . Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(2):207-14. PMC: 2875116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02276.x. View

20.

Cowan N . The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x01003922. View