» Articles » PMID: 19225460

Decoding Reveals the Contents of Visual Working Memory in Early Visual Areas

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Feb 20
PMID 19225460
Citations 544
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual working memory provides an essential link between perception and higher cognitive functions, allowing for the active maintenance of information about stimuli no longer in view. Research suggests that sustained activity in higher-order prefrontal, parietal, inferotemporal and lateral occipital areas supports visual maintenance, and may account for the limited capacity of working memory to hold up to 3-4 items. Because higher-order areas lack the visual selectivity of early sensory areas, it has remained unclear how observers can remember specific visual features, such as the precise orientation of a grating, with minimal decay in performance over delays of many seconds. One proposal is that sensory areas serve to maintain fine-tuned feature information, but early visual areas show little to no sustained activity over prolonged delays. Here we show that orientations held in working memory can be decoded from activity patterns in the human visual cortex, even when overall levels of activity are low. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and pattern classification methods, we found that activity patterns in visual areas V1-V4 could predict which of two oriented gratings was held in memory with mean accuracy levels upwards of 80%, even in participants whose activity fell to baseline levels after a prolonged delay. These orientation-selective activity patterns were sustained throughout the delay period, evident in individual visual areas, and similar to the responses evoked by unattended, task-irrelevant gratings. Our results demonstrate that early visual areas can retain specific information about visual features held in working memory, over periods of many seconds when no physical stimulus is present.

Citing Articles

Decoding auditory working memory content from EEG aftereffects of auditory-cortical TMS.

Uluc I, Daneshzand M, Jas M, Kotlarz P, Lankinen K, Fiedler J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975364 PMC: 11838191. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.04.583379.


Complementary benefits of multivariate and hierarchical models for identifying individual differences in cognitive control.

Freund M, Chen R, Chen G, Braver T Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025; 3.

PMID: 39957839 PMC: 11823007. DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00447.


Decoding Parametric Grip-Force Anticipation From fMRI Data.

Caccialupi G, Schmidt T, Nierhaus T, Wesolek S, Esmeyer M, Blankenburg F Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(3):e70154.

PMID: 39936353 PMC: 11815324. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70154.


Neurocognitive dynamics and behavioral differences of symmetry and asymmetry processing in working memory: insights from fNIRS.

Sztuka I, Kuhn S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4740.

PMID: 39922837 PMC: 11807122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84988-8.


Modality-, feature-, and strategy-dependent organization of low-level working memory.

Chopurian V, Kienke A, Bledowski C, Christophel T J Vis. 2025; 25(1):16.

PMID: 39873647 PMC: 11781326. DOI: 10.1167/jov.25.1.16.


References
1.
Magnussen S, Greenlee M . The psychophysics of perceptual memory. Psychol Res. 1999; 62(2-3):81-92. DOI: 10.1007/s004260050043. View

2.
Miyashita Y, Chang H . Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortex. Nature. 1988; 331(6151):68-70. DOI: 10.1038/331068a0. View

3.
Bisley J, Zaksas D, Droll J, Pasternak T . Activity of neurons in cortical area MT during a memory for motion task. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 91(1):286-300. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00870.2003. View

4.
Wang X . Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends Neurosci. 2001; 24(8):455-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01868-3. View

5.
Kamitani Y, Tong F . Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(5):679-85. PMC: 1808230. DOI: 10.1038/nn1444. View