Dose Reduction in Spiral CT Coronary Angiography with Dual-source Equipment. Part I. A Phantom Study Applying Different Prospective Tube Current Modulation Algorithms

Overview

Journal Radiol Med

Specialty Radiology

Date 2009 Aug 8

PMID 19662339

Citations 8

Authors

C Martini

A Palumbo

E Maffei

A Rossi

M Rengo

R Malago

M Dijkshoorn

A Weustink

N Mollet

G Krestin

F Cademartiri

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The authors sought to compare different algorithms for dose reduction in retrospectively echocardiographically (ECG)-gated dual-source computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) in a phantom model.

Materials And Methods: Weighted CT dose index (CTDI) was measured by using an anthropomorphic phantom in spiral cardiac mode (retrospective ECG gating) at five pitch values adapted with two heart-rate-adaptive ECG pulsing windows using four algorithms: narrow pulsing window, with tube current reduction to 20% (A) and 4% (B) of peak current outside the pulsing window; wide pulsing window, with tube current reduction to 20% (C) and 4% (D). Each algorithm was applied at different heart rates (45, 60, 75, 90, 120 bpm).

Results: Mean CTDI volume (CTDIvol) was 36.9+/-9.7 mGy, 23.9+/-5.6 mGy, 49.7+/-16.2 mGy and 38.5+/-12.3 mGy for A, B, C and D, respectively. Consistent dose reduction was observed with protocols applying the 4% tube current reduction (B and D). Using the conversion coefficient for the chest, the mean effective dose was the highest for C (9.6 mSv) and the lowest for B (4.6 mSv). Heart-ratedependent pitch values (pitch=0.2, 0.26, 0.34, 0.43, 0.5) and the use of heart-rate-adaptive ECG pulsing windows provided a significant decrease in the CTDIvol with progressively higher heart rates (45, 60, 75, 90, 120 bpm), despite using wider pulsing windows.

Conclusions: Radiation exposure with DSCT-CA using a narrow pulsing window significantly decreases when compared with a wider pulsing window. When using a protocol with reduced tube current to 4%, the radiation dose is significantly lower.

Citing Articles

256-slice CT coronary angiography: in vivo dosimetry and technique optimization.

Belgrano M, Bregant P, Djoguela M, Toscano W, Marchese E, Cova M Radiol Med. 2013; 119(4):249-56.

PMID: 24337756 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0334-3.

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) and Computed Tomography (CCT) in Facilitating Heart Failure Management.

Stacey R, Hundley W Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2013; 15(4):373-86.

PMID: 23817725 PMC: 3767383. DOI: 10.1007/s11936-013-0253-6.

Prevalence of Congenital Coronary Artery Anomalies and Variants in 2697 Consecutive Patients Using 64-Detector Row Coronary CTAngiography.

Shabestari A, Akhlaghpoor S, Tayebivaljozi R, Fattahi Masrour F Iran J Radiol. 2013; 9(3):111-21.

PMID: 23329976 PMC: 3522371. DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.8070.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data on the comparison between male and female population.

Maffei E, Martini C, Tedeschi C, Spagnolo P, Zuccarelli A, Arcadi T Radiol Med. 2011; 117(1):6-18.

PMID: 21643636 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0693-6.

Computed tomography coronary angiography in the selection of outlier patients: a feasibility report.

Maffei E, Martini C, Seitun S, Arcadi T, Tedeschi C, Guaricci A Radiol Med. 2011; 117(2):214-29.

PMID: 21643634 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0695-4.

References

Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R, Nieman K, Mollet N, de Feyter P . Non-invasive angiography of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography: state of the art and future prospects. Radiol Med. 2003; 106(4):284-96. View

Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Stilianakis N . Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(25):2393-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.017. View

Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, Mennicke M . Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179(4):911-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790911. View

Flohr T, McCollough C, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C . First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2005; 16(2):256-68. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2919-2. View

Passariello R, De Santis M . [Coronary artery disease. Update and prospects of radiologic imaging with CT and MR]. Radiol Med. 2001; 101(6):411-23. View

Romagnoli A, Nisini A, Gandini R, Tomassini M, Fabiano S, Pocek M . Multidetector row CT coronary angiography: technique and preliminary experience. Radiol Med. 2002; 103(5-6):443-55. View

Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Gaemperli O, Valenta I . Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42(8):543-9. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31803b93cf. View

Schoepf U, Becker C, Ohnesorge B, Yucel E . CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2004; 232(1):18-37. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2321030636. View

Nagatani Y, Takahashi M, Takazakura R, Nitta N, Murata K, Ushio N . Multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: optimization of image reconstruction phase according to the heart rate. Circ J. 2006; 71(1):112-21. DOI: 10.1253/circj.71.112. View

10.

Weustink A, Mollet N, Pugliese F, Meijboom W, Nieman K, Heijenbrok-Kal M . Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2008; 248(3):792-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483072098. View

11.

Francone M, Napoli A, Carbone I, Cavacece M, Nardis P, Lanciotti K . Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns. Radiol Med. 2007; 112(1):31-46. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0118-8. View

12.

Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O . Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(12):2739-47. PMC: 1705545. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0. View

13.

Vogl T, Abolmaali N, Diebold T, Engelmann K, Ay M, Dogan S . Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology. 2002; 223(1):212-20. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2231010515. View

14.

Luz O, Buchgeister M, Klabunde M, Trabold T, Kopp A, Claussen C . Evaluation of dose exposure in 64-slice CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(10):2616-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0601-6. View

15.

Johnson T, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger B, Leber A, von Ziegler F, Rist C . Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(7):1409-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0298-y. View

16.

Li Z, Guo Y, Hu G, Ma E, Yuan Y . [Influence of cardiac rhythm on image quality of 64-slice multidetector-row CT coronary angiography and clinic value of post-processing technology with image]. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2008; 39(2):305-8. View

17.

Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, Frauenfelder T, Leschka S, Husmann L . Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2007; 18(3):592-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0786-8. View

18.

Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, Kettering K, Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C . Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart. 2005; 91(7):938-41. PMC: 1769005. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.044735. View

19.

McCollough C, Primak A, Saba O, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R . Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology. 2007; 243(3):775-84. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2433061165. View

20.

Fei X, Du X, Li P, Liao J, Shen Y, Li K . Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: a cardiac phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 67(1):85-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.008. View