Generalized Signaling for Control: Evidence from Postconflict and Posterror Performance Adjustments

Overview

Journal J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform

Specialty Psychology

Date 2009 Aug 6

PMID 19653756

Citations 9

Authors

Raymond Y Cho

Joseph M Orr

Jonathan D Cohen

Cameron S Carter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior requires cognitive control to effect online adjustments in response to ongoing processing demands. How signaling for these adjustments occurs has been a question of much interest. A basic question regarding the architecture of the cognitive control system is whether such signaling for control is specific to task context or generalizes across contexts. In this study, the authors explored this issue using a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. They examined trial-to-trial adjustments, specifically, the findings that incompatible trials elicit improved performance on subsequent incompatible trials and that responses are slower after errors. The critical question was, Do such control effects-typically observed within a single task context-occur across task contexts? The paradigm involved 2 orthogonal, stimulus-response sets: Stimuli in the horizontal direction mapped only to responses in the horizontal direction, and likewise for the vertical direction. Cues indicated that either compatible (same direction as stimulus) or incompatible (opposite to stimulus) responses were required. The results showed that trial-to-trial adjustments exist for both direction-repeat and direction-switch trials, demonstrating that signaling for control adjustments can extend beyond the task context within which they arise.

Citing Articles

Behavioral facilitation and increased brain responses from a high interference working memory context.

Samrani G, Marklund P, Engstrom L, Broman D, Persson J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):15308.

PMID: 30333513 PMC: 6193025. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33616-3.

Slowing after Observed Error Transfers across Tasks.

Wang L, Pan W, Tan J, Liu C, Chen A PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0149836.

PMID: 26934579 PMC: 4775031. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149836.

What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.

Braem S, Abrahamse E, Duthoo W, Notebaert W Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1134.

PMID: 25339930 PMC: 4189611. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134.

Context specificity of post-error and post-conflict cognitive control adjustments.

Forster S, Cho R PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90281.

PMID: 24603900 PMC: 3946012. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090281.

EEG source reconstruction reveals frontal-parietal dynamics of spatial conflict processing.

Cohen M, Ridderinkhof K PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e57293.

PMID: 23451201 PMC: 3581478. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057293.

References

Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, Blanke L . Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991; 78(6):447-55. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9. View

Jones A, Cho R, Nystrom L, Cohen J, Braver T . A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003; 2(4):300-17. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.2.4.300. View

Sturmer B, Redlich M, Irlbacher K, Brandt S . Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 183(3):329-39. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1053-6. View

Kerns J . Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage. 2006; 33(1):399-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.012. View

Durston S, Davidson M, Thomas K, Worden M, Tottenham N, Martinez A . Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 2003; 20(4):2135-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.004. View

van Veen V, Carter C . The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 14(4):593-602. DOI: 10.1162/08989290260045837. View

Smith G, Brewer N . Slowness and age: speed-accuracy mechanisms. Psychol Aging. 1995; 10(2):238-47. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.10.2.238. View

Botvinick M, Nystrom L, Fissell K, Carter C, Cohen J . Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature. 2000; 402(6758):179-81. DOI: 10.1038/46035. View

Rabbitt P . Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. J Exp Psychol. 1966; 71(2):264-72. DOI: 10.1037/h0022853. View

10.

Debener S, Ullsperger M, Siegel M, Fiehler K, von Cramon D, Engel A . Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(50):11730-7. PMC: 6726024. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3286-05.2005. View

11.

Kunde W, Wuhr P . Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Mem Cognit. 2006; 34(2):356-67. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193413. View

12.

Sturmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E, Schroter H, Sommer W . Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003; 28(6):1345-63. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345. View

13.

Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof K . Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003; 3(1):17-26. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.17. View

14.

Notebaert W, Verguts T . Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition. 2007; 106(2):1071-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011. View

15.

Levine J, Meiran N, Henik A . Task set switching in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology. 2000; 14(3):471-82. DOI: 10.1037//0894-4105.14.3.471. View

16.

Egner T, Delano M, Hirsch J . Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2007; 35(2):940-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.061. View

17.

Verbruggen F, Liefooghe B, Notebaert W, Vandierendonck A . Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005; 120(3):307-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003. View

18.

Fan J, Flombaum J, McCandliss B, Thomas K, Posner M . Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage. 2003; 18(1):42-57. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1319. View

19.

MacDonald 3rd A, Cohen J, Stenger V, Carter C . Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science. 2000; 288(5472):1835-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835. View

20.

Cho R, Konecky R, Carter C . Impairments in frontal cortical gamma synchrony and cognitive control in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(52):19878-83. PMC: 1750867. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609440103. View