» Articles » PMID: 16354931

Trial-by-trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 Dec 16
PMID 16354931
Citations 416
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Goal-directed behavior requires the continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment of ongoing actions. Here, we report a direct coupling between the event-related electroencephalogram (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and behavioral measures of performance monitoring in humans. By applying independent component analysis to EEG signals recorded simultaneously with fMRI, we found the single-trial error-related negativity of the EEG to be systematically related to behavior in the subsequent trial, thereby reflecting immediate behavioral adjustments of a cognitive performance monitoring system. Moreover, this trial-by-trial EEG measure of performance monitoring predicted the fMRI activity in the rostral cingulate zone, a brain region thought to play a key role in processing of response errors. We conclude that investigations of the dynamic coupling between EEG and fMRI provide a powerful approach for the study of higher order brain functions.

Citing Articles

The impact of impulsivity and compulsivity on error processing in different motivational contexts.

Overmeyer R, Endrass T Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 40045099 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-025-01281-5.


A network analysis of affective and motivational individual differences and error monitoring in a non-clinical sample.

Grabowska A, Sondej F, Senderecka M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(10).

PMID: 39462813 PMC: 11513196. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae397.


Top-down and bottom-up oscillatory dynamics regulate implicit visuomotor sequence learning.

Lum J, Barham M, Hyde C, Hill A, White D, Hughes M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(7.

PMID: 39046456 PMC: 11267723. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae266.


Psychosis superspectrum II: neurobiology, treatment, and implications.

Kotov R, Carpenter W, Cicero D, Correll C, Martin E, Young J Mol Psychiatry. 2024; 29(5):1293-1309.

PMID: 38351173 PMC: 11731826. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02410-1.


Success versus failure in cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing.

Cieslik E, Ullsperger M, Gell M, Eickhoff S, Langner R Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 156:105468.

PMID: 37979735 PMC: 10976187. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105468.


References
1.
Luu P, Flaisch T, Tucker D . Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(1):464-9. PMC: 6774138. View

2.
Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Christ S, Hohnsbein J . ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol Psychol. 2000; 51(2-3):87-107. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00031-9. View

3.
Miezin F, Maccotta L, Ollinger J, Petersen S, Buckner R . Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage. 2000; 11(6 Pt 1):735-59. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0568. View

4.
Allen P, Josephs O, Turner R . A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(2):230-9. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0599. View

5.
Nunez P, Silberstein R . On the relationship of synaptic activity to macroscopic measurements: does co-registration of EEG with fMRI make sense?. Brain Topogr. 2001; 13(2):79-96. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026683200895. View