» Articles » PMID: 19653104

Gene-expression Profiling of Grape Bud Response to Two Alternative Dormancy-release Stimuli Expose Possible Links Between Impaired Mitochondrial Activity, Hypoxia, Ethylene-ABA Interplay and Cell Enlargement

Overview
Journal Plant Mol Biol
Date 2009 Aug 5
PMID 19653104
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A grape-bud-oriented genomic platform was produced for a large-scale comparative analysis of bud responses to two stimuli of grape-bud dormancy release, hydrogen cyanamide (HC) and heat shock (HS). The results suggested considerable similarity in bud response to the stimuli, both in the repertoire of responding genes and in the temporary nature of the transcriptome reprogramming. Nevertheless, the bud response to HC was delayed, more condensed and stronger, as reflected by a higher number of regulated genes and a higher intensity of regulation compared to the response to HS. Integrating the changes occurring in response to both stimuli suggested perturbation of mitochondrial activity, development of oxidative stress and establishment of a situation that resembles hypoxia, which coincides with induction of glycolysis and fermentation, as well as changes in the interplay between ABA and ethylene metabolism. The latter is known to induce various growth responses in submerged plants and the possibility of a similar mechanism operating in the bud meristem during dormancy release is raised. The new link suggested between sub lethal stress, mitochondrial activity, hypoxic conditions, ethylene metabolism and cell enlargement during bud dormancy release may be instrumental in understanding the dormancy-release mechanism. Temporary increase of acetaldehyde, ethanol and ethylene in response to dormancy release stimuli demonstrated the predictive power of the working model, and its relevance to dormancy release was demonstrated by enhancement of bud break by exogenous ethylene and its inhibition by an ethylene signal inhibitor.

Citing Articles

Identification of an ethylene-responsive and cell wall-secreting β-1,3-glucanase, VvGLU1, in the early cell regrowth of grape winter buds triggered by exogenous dormancy releasers.

Shi Z, Wu J, Mo H, Xue W, Zhang Z, Pang X BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):22.

PMID: 39849520 PMC: 11756123. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02120-2.


Case study of a rhizosphere microbiome assay on a bamboo rhizome with excessive shoots.

Cui F, Yang Y, Ye M, Wei W, Huang W, Wu Y For Res (Fayettev). 2024; 1:10.

PMID: 39524517 PMC: 11524271. DOI: 10.48130/FR-2021-0010.


An integrated targeted metabolome of phytohormones and transcriptomics analysis provides insight into the new generation of crops: var. and .

Ning L, Xiao Q, Tan C, Gong L, Liu Y, Wang Z Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1464731.

PMID: 39381514 PMC: 11458434. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1464731.


Identification of a key signaling network regulating perennating bud dormancy in .

Hong J, Han S, Geem K, Bae W, Kim J, Jee M J Ginseng Res. 2024; 48(5):511-519.

PMID: 39263311 PMC: 11385393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2024.04.004.


MIKC type MADS-box transcription factor LcSVP2 is involved in dormancy regulation of the terminal buds in evergreen perennial litchi ( Sonn.).

Ma M, Zhang H, Tian Q, Wang H, Zhang F, Tian X Hortic Res. 2024; 11(7):uhae150.

PMID: 38988620 PMC: 11233856. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae150.


References
1.
Mazzitelli L, Hancock R, Haupt S, Walker P, Pont S, McNicol J . Co-ordinated gene expression during phases of dormancy release in raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) buds. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58(5):1035-45. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl266. View

2.
Lasanthi-Kudahettige R, Magneschi L, Loreti E, Gonzali S, Licausi F, Novi G . Transcript profiling of the anoxic rice coleoptile. Plant Physiol. 2007; 144(1):218-31. PMC: 1913783. DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.093997. View

3.
Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sultmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M . Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18 Suppl 1:S96-104. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s96. View

4.
Baxter C, Redestig H, Schauer N, Repsilber D, Patil K, Nielsen J . The metabolic response of heterotrophic Arabidopsis cells to oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 2006; 143(1):312-25. PMC: 1761969. DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.090431. View

5.
Nir G, Shulman Y, Fanberstein L, Lavee S . Changes in the Activity of Catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) in Relation to the Dormancy of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Buds. Plant Physiol. 1986; 81(4):1140-2. PMC: 1075499. DOI: 10.1104/pp.81.4.1140. View