» Articles » PMID: 19581199

Progressive Adaptive Physical Activity in Stroke Improves Balance, Gait, and Fitness: Preliminary Results

Overview
Date 2009 Jul 8
PMID 19581199
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We conducted a non-controlled pilot intervention study in stroke survivors to examine the efficacy of low-intensity adaptive physical activity to increase balance, improve walking function, and increase cardiovascular fitness and to determine whether improvements were carried over into activity profiles in home and community.

Method: Adaptive physical activity sessions were conducted 3 times/week for 6 months. The main outcomes were Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, 6-Minute Walk Test, cardiovascular fitness (VO2 peak), Falls Efficacy Scale, and 5-day Step Activity Monitoring.

Results: Seven men and women with chronic ischemic stroke completed the 6-month intervention. The mean Berg Balance baseline score increased from 33.9+/-8.5 to 46+/-6.7 at 6 months (mean+/-SD; p=.006). Dynamic Gait Index increased from 13.7+/-3.0 to 19.0+/-3.5 (p=.01). Six-minute walk distance increased from 840+/-110 feet to 935+/-101 feet (p=0.02). VO2 peak increased from 15.3+/-4.1 mL/kg/min to 17.5+/-4.7 mL/kg/min (p=.03). There were no significant changes in falls efficacy or free-living ambulatory activity.

Conclusion: A structured adaptive physical activity produces improvements in balance, gait, fitness, and ambulatory performance but not in falls efficacy or free-living daily step activity. Randomized studies are needed to determine the cardiovascular health and functional benefits of structured group physical activity programs and to develop behavioral interventions that promote increased free-living physical activity patterns.

Citing Articles

Compared Block Periodized and Non-Periodized Physical Activity Programs in Older Adults.

Moreno-Mateos A, Barbero Iglesias F, Sanchez Munoz A, Gutierrez Diaz Y, Moreno Pascual C Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38786988 PMC: 11125595. DOI: 10.3390/sports12050119.


Exploring the personal stroke and rehabilitation experiences of older adults with chronic stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative descriptive study.

Lee N, Pearson E, Sanzo P, Klarner T Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2331431.

PMID: 38511399 PMC: 10962289. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2331431.


Increasing Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Intensity Walking and Step Activity Intervention.

Thompson E, Pohlig R, McCartney K, Hornby T, Kasner S, Raser-Schramm J Stroke. 2023; 55(1):5-13.

PMID: 38134254 PMC: 10752299. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044596.


Beyond steps per day: other measures of real-world walking after stroke related to cardiovascular risk.

Miller A, Collier Z, Reisman D J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022; 19(1):111.

PMID: 36242083 PMC: 9563761. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01091-7.


Gains in Daily Stepping Activity in People With Chronic Stroke After High-Intensity Gait Training in Variable Contexts.

Hornby T, Plawecki A, Lotter J, Scofield M, Lucas E, Henderson C Phys Ther. 2022; 102(8).

PMID: 35670001 PMC: 9396452. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac073.


References
1.
Enright P . The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. 2003; 48(8):783-5. View

2.
Michael K, Allen J, Macko R . Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(8):1552-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026. View

3.
Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, Forrester L, Coleman K, Macko R . Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(12):1997-2001. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.035. View

4.
Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D . Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(11):1410-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.109. View

5.
Macko R, Smith G, Dobrovolny C, Sorkin J, Goldberg A, Silver K . Treadmill training improves fitness reserve in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82(7):879-84. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23853. View