» Articles » PMID: 19574427

Alternative Splicing of Pre-mRNA in Cancer: Focus on G Protein-coupled Peptide Hormone Receptors

Overview
Journal Am J Pathol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pathology
Date 2009 Jul 4
PMID 19574427
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Through alternative splicing, multiple different transcripts can be generated from a single gene. Alternative splicing represents an important molecular mechanism of gene regulation in physiological processes such as developmental programming as well as in disease. In cancer, splicing is significantly altered. Tumors express a different collection of alternative spliceoforms than normal tissues. Many tumor-associated splice variants arise from genes with an established role in carcinogenesis or tumor progression, and their functions can be oncogenic. This raises the possibility that products of alternative splicing play a pathogenic role in cancer. Moreover, cancer-associated spliceoforms represent potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. G protein-coupled peptide hormone receptors provide a good illustration of alternative splicing in cancer. The wild-type forms of these receptors have long been known to be expressed in cancer and to modulate tumor cell functions. They are also recognized as attractive clinical targets. Recently, splice variants of these receptors have been increasingly identified in various types of cancer. In particular, alternative cholecystokinin type 2, secretin, and growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor spliceoforms are expressed in tumors. Peptide hormone receptor splice variants can fundamentally differ from their wild-type receptor counterparts in pharmacological and functional characteristics, in their distribution in normal and malignant tissues, and in their potential use for clinical applications.

Citing Articles

Recent Progress of Biomarker Detection Sensors.

Liu R, Ye X, Cui T Research (Wash D C). 2020; 2020:7949037.

PMID: 33123683 PMC: 7585038. DOI: 10.34133/2020/7949037.


Functional characterization of alternatively spliced GSN in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Kelley D, Flam E, Guo T, Danilova L, Zamuner F, Bohrson C Transl Res. 2018; 202:109-119.

PMID: 30118659 PMC: 6218276. DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2018.07.007.


Prognostic values of tissue factor and its alternatively splice transcripts in human gastric cancer tissues.

Wu M, Chen L, Xu T, Xu B, Jiang J, Wu C Oncotarget. 2017; 8(32):53137-53145.

PMID: 28881799 PMC: 5581098. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17942.


Transcriptome Bioinformatical Analysis of Vertebrate Stages of Schistosoma japonicum Reveals Alternative Splicing Events.

Wang X, Xu X, Lu X, Zhang Y, Pan W PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0138470.

PMID: 26407301 PMC: 4583307. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138470.


Novel Insights into NeuN: from Neuronal Marker to Splicing Regulator.

Duan W, Zhang Y, Hou Z, Huang C, Zhu H, Zhang C Mol Neurobiol. 2015; 53(3):1637-1647.

PMID: 25680637 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-015-9122-5.


References
1.
Borjesson P, Postema E, Roos J, Colnot D, Marres H, van Schie M . Phase I therapy study with (186)Re-labeled humanized monoclonal antibody BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9(10 Pt 2):3961S-72S. View

2.
Garcia-Blanco M, Baraniak A, Lasda E . Alternative splicing in disease and therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2004; 22(5):535-46. DOI: 10.1038/nbt964. View

3.
Black D . Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003; 72:291-336. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161720. View

4.
Okamoto I, Morisaki T, Sasaki J, Miyake H, Matsumoto M, Suga M . Molecular detection of cancer cells by competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of specific CD44 variant RNAs. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(4):307-15. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.4.307. View

5.
Lutz E, Ronaldson E, Shaw P, Johnson M, Holland P, Mitchell R . Characterization of novel splice variants of the PAC1 receptor in human neuroblastoma cells: consequences for signaling by VIP and PACAP. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005; 31(2):193-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.09.008. View