» Articles » PMID: 19564603

Quantitative Analysis of Dental Microwear in Hadrosaurid Dinosaurs, and the Implications for Hypotheses of Jaw Mechanics and Feeding

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Jul 1
PMID 19564603
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the feeding mechanisms and diet of nonavian dinosaurs is fundamental to understanding the paleobiology of these taxa and their role in Mesozoic terrestrial ecosystems. Various methods, including biomechanical analysis and 3D computer modeling, have been used to generate detailed functional hypotheses, but in the absence of either direct observations of dinosaur feeding behavior, or close living functional analogues, testing these hypotheses is problematic. Microscopic scratches that form on teeth in vivo during feeding are known to record the relative motion of the tooth rows to each other during feeding and to capture evidence of tooth-food interactions. Analysis of this dental microwear provides a powerful tool for testing hypotheses of jaw mechanics, diet, and trophic niche; yet, quantitative analysis of microwear in dinosaurs has not been attempted. Here, we show that analysis of tooth microwear orientation provides direct evidence for the relative motions of jaws during feeding in hadrosaurid ornithopods, the dominant terrestrial herbivores of the Late Cretaceous. Statistical testing demonstrates that Edmontosaurus teeth preserve 4 distinct sets of scratches in different orientations. In terms of jaw mechanics, these data indicate an isognathic, near-vertical posterodorsal power stroke during feeding; near-vertical jaw opening; and propalinal movements in near anterior and near posterior directions. Our analysis supports the presence of a pleurokinetic hinge, and the straightness and parallelism of scratches indicate a tightly controlled occlusion. The dominance of scratched microwear fabrics suggests that Edmontosaurus was a grazer rather than a browser.

Citing Articles

Trophic evolution in ornithopod dinosaurs revealed by dental wear.

osi A, Barrett P, Nagy A, Szenti I, Vasarhelyi L, Magyar J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7330.

PMID: 39187477 PMC: 11347701. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51697-9.


Multi-proxy dentition analyses reveal niche partitioning between sympatric herbivorous dinosaurs.

osi A, Barrett P, Evans A, Nagy A, Szenti I, Kukovecz A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):20813.

PMID: 36460688 PMC: 9718793. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24816-z.


A new ankylosaurid from the Upper Cretaceous Nemegt Formation of Mongolia and implications for paleoecology of armoured dinosaurs.

Park J, Lee Y, Kobayashi Y, Jacobs L, Barsbold R, Lee H Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22928.

PMID: 34824329 PMC: 8616956. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02273-4.


Exceptionally simple, rapidly replaced teeth in sauropod dinosaurs demonstrate a novel evolutionary strategy for herbivory in Late Jurassic ecosystems.

Melstrom K, Chiappe L, Smith N BMC Ecol Evol. 2021; 21(1):202.

PMID: 34742237 PMC: 8571970. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01932-4.


Dietary palaeoecology of an Early Cretaceous armoured dinosaur (Ornithischia; Nodosauridae) based on floral analysis of stomach contents.

Brown C, Greenwood D, Kalyniuk J, Braman D, Henderson D, Greenwood C R Soc Open Sci. 2020; 7(6):200305.

PMID: 32742695 PMC: 7353971. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200305.


References
1.
Purnell M, Bell M, Baines D, Hart P, Travis M . Correlated evolution and dietary change in fossil stickleback. Science. 2007; 317(5846):1887. DOI: 10.1126/science.1147337. View

2.
Ferry-Graham L, Bolnick D, Wainwright P . Using functional morphology to examine the ecology and evolution of specialization. Integr Comp Biol. 2011; 42(2):265-77. DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.2.265. View

3.
Teaford M, Ungar P . Diet and the evolution of the earliest human ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(25):13506-11. PMC: 17605. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.260368897. View

4.
Charles C, Jaeger J, Michaux J, Viriot L . Dental microwear in relation to changes in the direction of mastication during the evolution of Myodonta (Rodentia, Mammalia). Naturwissenschaften. 2006; 94(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-006-0161-7. View

5.
Calandra I, Gohlich U, Merceron G . How could sympatric megaherbivores coexist? Example of niche partitioning within a proboscidean community from the Miocene of Europe. Naturwissenschaften. 2008; 95(9):831-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-008-0391-y. View