» Articles » PMID: 21708718

Using Functional Morphology to Examine the Ecology and Evolution of Specialization

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Jun 29
PMID 21708718
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Researchers strive to understand what makes species different, and what allows them to survive in the time and space that they do. Many models have been advanced which encompass an array of ecological, evolutionary, mathematical, and logical principles. The goal has been to develop ecological theories that can, among other things, make specific and robust predictions about how and where organisms should live and what organisms should utilize. The role of functional morphology is often an under-appreciated parameter of these models. A more complete understanding of how anatomical features work to allow the organism to accomplish certain tasks has allowed us to revisit some of these ideas with a new perspective. We illustrate our view of this role for functional morphology in ecology by considering the issue of specialization: we attempt to align several definitions of specialization based upon shared ecological and evolutionary principles, and we summarize theoretical predictions regarding why an organism might specialize. Kinematic studies of prey capture in several types of fishes are explored with regard to the potential ecological and evolutionary consequences of specialization, most notably in the area of trade-offs. We suggest that a functional morphological perspective can increase our understanding of the ecological concepts of specialization and it consequences. The kinds of data that functional morphologists collect can help us to quantify organismal performance associated with specialization and the union of functional morphology with ecology can help us to better understand not just how but why organisms interact in the manner that they do.

Citing Articles

Spatial pattern of woody plant species richness and composition in primary warm temperate evergreen forest in Kasugayama Hill, Japan.

Watanabe S, Maesako Y, Inada T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26570.

PMID: 39496734 PMC: 11535506. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77438-y.


Comparative adult preference-larval performance relationship between a specialist and a generalist tephritid: Implication for predicting field host-range.

Lauciello N, Mille C, Hafsi A, Jacob V, Duyck P Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70170.

PMID: 39139912 PMC: 11319923. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70170.


Exhibits Interindividual Differences in Behavioural and Problem-Solving Performance.

Dissegna A, Borrelli L, Ponte G, Chiandetti C, Fiorito G Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 38132313 PMC: 10740590. DOI: 10.3390/biology12121487.


From Fairies to Giants: Untangling the Effect of Body Size, Phylogeny, and Ecology on Vertebral Bone Microstructure of Xenarthran Mammals.

Zack E, Smith S, Angielczyk K Integr Org Biol. 2023; 5(1):obad002.

PMID: 36844392 PMC: 9949600. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obad002.


Defining plant ecological specialists and generalists: Building a framework for identification and classification.

Kirsch A, Kaproth M Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(11):e9527.

PMID: 36440310 PMC: 9685674. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9527.