» Articles » PMID: 19563630

Translation, Adaptation and Validation of the American Short Form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) in a Danish Version

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Jul 1
PMID 19563630
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a measure that assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. This study validates the Danish translation of the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) in a Danish population with dysglycaemia.

Methods: 358 people with screen-detected dysglycaemia participating in a primary care health education study responded to PAM13. The PAM13 was translated into Danish by a standardised forward-backward translation. Data quality was assessed by mean, median, item response, missing values, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and average inter-item correlation) and item-rest correlations. Scale properties were assessed by Rasch Rating Scale models.

Results: The item response was high with a small number of missing values (0.8-4.2%). Floor effect was small (range 0.6-3.6%), but the ceiling effect was above 15% for all items (range 18.6-62.7%). The alpha-coefficient was 0.89 and the average inter-item correlation 0.38. The Danish version formed a unidimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale explaining 43.2% of the variance. We did however, find a different item sequence compared to the original scale.

Conclusion: A Danish version of PAM13 with acceptable validity and reliability is now available. Further development should focus on single items, response categories in relation to ceiling effects and further validation of reproducibility and responsiveness.

Citing Articles

Determinants of Dropping Out of Remote Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Follow-Up Among Patients With Epilepsy: Prospective Cohort Study.

Bech Vestergaard S, Roost M, Christiansen D, Schougaard L JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9():e58258.

PMID: 39815409 PMC: 11755678. DOI: 10.2196/58258.


Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Barello S, Anderson G, Bosio C, Lane D, Leo D, Lobban T Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1345117.

PMID: 39100568 PMC: 11294995. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345117.


A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of the Patient Activation Measure Tool.

Ng Q, Liau M, Tan Y, Tang A, Ong C, Thumboo J Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 38891154 PMC: 11171848. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111079.


The Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) in an oncology patient population: psychometric properties and dimensionality evaluation.

Roesel I, Froehlich D, Joos S, Valentini J, Mauch H, Martus P Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):39.

PMID: 38764032 PMC: 11103863. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02255-w.


Measuring patient activation: the utility of the Patient Activation Measure administered in an interview setting.

Holter M, Avian A, Weger M, Strini S, Michelitsch M, Brenk-Franz K Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(5):1389-1400.

PMID: 38388807 PMC: 11045573. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03614-2.


References
1.
Sitzia J . How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999; 11(4):319-28. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319. View

2.
Hibbard J, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M . Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004; 39(4 Pt 1):1005-26. PMC: 1361049. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x. View

3.
McHorney C, TARLOV A . Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4(4):293-307. DOI: 10.1007/BF01593882. View

4.
SILVERSTEIN B, Kilgore K, FISHER W, Harley J, Harvey R . Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: I. Exploring unidimensionality. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 72(9):631-7. View

5.
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A . Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005; 8(2):94-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. View