» Articles » PMID: 19543366

A Network of Conserved Damage Survival Pathways Revealed by a Genomic RNAi Screen

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2009 Jun 23
PMID 19543366
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Damage initiates a pleiotropic cellular response aimed at cellular survival when appropriate. To identify genes required for damage survival, we used a cell-based RNAi screen against the Drosophila genome and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulphonate (MMS). Similar studies performed in other model organisms report that damage response may involve pleiotropic cellular processes other than the central DNA repair components, yet an intuitive systems level view of the cellular components required for damage survival, their interrelationship, and contextual importance has been lacking. Further, by comparing data from different model organisms, identification of conserved and presumably core survival components should be forthcoming. We identified 307 genes, representing 13 signaling, metabolic, or enzymatic pathways, affecting cellular survival of MMS-induced damage. As expected, the majority of these pathways are involved in DNA repair; however, several pathways with more diverse biological functions were also identified, including the TOR pathway, transcription, translation, proteasome, glutathione synthesis, ATP synthesis, and Notch signaling, and these were equally important in damage survival. Comparison with genomic screen data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed no overlap enrichment of individual genes between the species, but a conservation of the pathways. To demonstrate the functional conservation of pathways, five were tested in Drosophila and mouse cells, with each pathway responding to alkylation damage in both species. Using the protein interactome, a significant level of connectivity was observed between Drosophila MMS survival proteins, suggesting a higher order relationship. This connectivity was dramatically improved by incorporating the components of the 13 identified pathways within the network. Grouping proteins into "pathway nodes" qualitatively improved the interactome organization, revealing a highly organized "MMS survival network." We conclude that identification of pathways can facilitate comparative biology analysis when direct gene/orthologue comparisons fail. A biologically intuitive, highly interconnected MMS survival network was revealed after we incorporated pathway data in our interactome analysis.

Citing Articles

Structures of the germline-specific Deadhead and thioredoxin T proteins from reveal unique features among thioredoxins.

Freier R, Aragon E, Baginski B, Pluta R, Martin-Malpartida P, Ruiz L IUCrJ. 2021; 8(Pt 2):281-294.

PMID: 33708404 PMC: 7924233. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252521000221.


A Drosophila cell-free system that senses DNA breaks and triggers phosphorylation signalling.

Harpprecht L, Baldi S, Schauer T, Schmidt A, Bange T, Robles M Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(14):7444-7459.

PMID: 31147711 PMC: 6698661. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz473.


Daily Regulation of Phototransduction, Circadian Clock, DNA Repair, and Immune Gene Expression by Heme Oxygenase in the Retina of Drosophila.

Damulewicz M, Swiatek M, Loboda A, Dulak J, Bilska B, Przewlocki R Genes (Basel). 2018; 10(1).

PMID: 30583479 PMC: 6357063. DOI: 10.3390/genes10010006.


Transcriptional response of honey bee (Apis mellifera) to differential nutritional status and Nosema infection.

Azzouz-Olden F, Hunt A, DeGrandi-Hoffman G BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):628.

PMID: 30134827 PMC: 6106827. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5007-0.


EWS-FLI1 increases transcription to cause R-loops and block BRCA1 repair in Ewing sarcoma.

Gorthi A, Romero J, Loranc E, Cao L, Lawrence L, Goodale E Nature. 2018; 555(7696):387-391.

PMID: 29513652 PMC: 6318124. DOI: 10.1038/nature25748.


References
1.
Dickinson D, Levonen A, Moellering D, Arnold E, Zhang H, Darley-Usmar V . Human glutamate cysteine ligase gene regulation through the electrophile response element. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004; 37(8):1152-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.06.011. View

2.
Begley T, Samson L . Network responses to DNA damaging agents. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004; 3(8-9):1123-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.013. View

3.
Liu L, Taverna P, Whitacre C, Chatterjee S, Gerson S . Pharmacologic disruption of base excision repair sensitizes mismatch repair-deficient and -proficient colon cancer cells to methylating agents. Clin Cancer Res. 1999; 5(10):2908-17. View

4.
Begley T, Rosenbach A, Ideker T, Samson L . Hot spots for modulating toxicity identified by genomic phenotyping and localization mapping. Mol Cell. 2004; 16(1):117-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.005. View

5.
Burgis N, Samson L . The protein degradation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to classical DNA-damaging agents. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007; 20(12):1843-53. DOI: 10.1021/tx700126e. View