» Articles » PMID: 19536624

Intravascular Foreign Bodies: Danger of Unretrieved Fragmented Medical Devices

Overview
Journal J Artif Organs
Date 2009 Jun 19
PMID 19536624
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A warning on the danger of unretrieved device fragments and recommendations to mitigate the danger were issued by the Food and Drug Administration in January 2008. The causes of intravascular foreign bodies are classified into three main categories: improper manipulation and usage, device defects, and others, such as patient and anatomical factors. Device failure after long-term use is rarely predicted at the time of approval, since device abnormality is rarely experienced in animal studies and clinical trials conducted during development of the device. Stent fracture due to metal fatigue is one example. Complex complications could occur from simultaneous use of two or more devices with diverse characteristics. The success rate of percutaneous retrieval of intravascular foreign bodies has improved with the advances in commercially available devices. However, the procedure is not always successful and sometimes surgical removal becomes necessary. Appropriate device selection and acquisition of experience in using the device are important. When an intravascular foreign body cannot be retrieved, the risk of complication could be high. Magnetic resonance imaging examination sometimes causes adverse events, including burns due to the heat generated by metal movement. Such information should be correctly recorded. Furthermore, it is necessary to provide patients with adequate information about the characteristics of implanted devices and unretrieved fragments. We reviewed the literature on unretrieved medical device fragments and include articles that describe the Japanese experience.

Citing Articles

Migration of a ureteral stent made from a nasogastric tube into the inferior vena cava: A case report.

Bekele S, Mengistie B, Mengistie C, Bereded S, Haile A, Belisa T Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 126():110786.

PMID: 39740417 PMC: 11750259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110786.


Pulmonary embolism and hemorrhage after displacement of angiographic catheter tip to pulmonary artery: A case report and literature review.

Xiong L, Zhuo L, Zhang J, Liang S, Wang Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e24542.

PMID: 38322923 PMC: 10843997. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24542.


Endovascular Retrieval of a Fractured Tunneled Hemodialysis Central Venous Catheter Using the Loop Snare Technique.

Sasaki T, Fujioka Y, Hikichi H, Yokota D, Ueki S Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e35617.

PMID: 37007421 PMC: 10065372. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35617.


CT-guided retrieval of a fractured intravenous cannula in a toddler: A case report.

Adeosun P, Abdulazeez A, Okeke U, Ehinmosan O, Eze E Afr J Emerg Med. 2020; 10(4):277-280.

PMID: 33299764 PMC: 7700989. DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.06.010.


Successful percutaneous transvenous retrieval of intravascular fractured port catheter: a single center experience.

Li Y, Chen J, Li Z, Lu H, Ren K, Ren J J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 15(1):101.

PMID: 32423421 PMC: 7236484. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01131-0.


References
1.
Steele P, Holmes Jr D, MANKIN H, Schaff H . Intravascular retrieval of broken guide wire from the ascending aorta after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1985; 11(6):623-8. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810110612. View

2.
Actis Dato G, Aidala E, Zattera G . Foreign bodies in the heart: surgical or medical therapy?. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68(1):291-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00384-7. View

3.
Shite J, Matsumoto D, Yokoyama M . Sirolimus-eluting stent fracture with thrombus, visualization by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J. 2005; 27(12):1389. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi542. View

4.
Shellock F, Crues J . MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):635-52. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323030830. View

5.
Gabelmann A, Kramer S, Gorich J . Percutaneous retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176(6):1509-13. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761509. View