» Articles » PMID: 19523712

Adaptation of a Commercial Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization Test to the Diagnosis of Malignant Cells in Effusions

Overview
Journal Lung Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Jun 16
PMID 19523712
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In effusion cytology, adjuvant techniques are often needed for the differentiation of reactive proliferating mesothelial cells and malignant cells. In the case of malignancy the further challenge is to distinguish metastatic tumors from the primary malignant mesothelioma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of cells in interphase is an accurate method to monitor the genetic status of cells, detecting aneuploid signals and gene deletions. Moreover, it has been proposed that a homozygous deletion of the p16(INK4A) gene could more specifically identify malignant mesothelial cells among the exfoliated cells. The first objective of this study was to adapt the commercial FISH-test, UroVysion originally designed for the cytological diagnosis of bladder cancer, to the analysis of cells in effusions. The second objective was to test the clinical utility of the test. Sixty-eight pleural effusions were evaluated. The cytological diagnosis was malignant in 29 cases, inconclusive in 24 cases and benign in 15 cases. The independently verified final diagnoses were mesothelioma in 21 cases, metastatic cancer in 29 and benign in 18 cases. The algorithm for aneuploidy distinguished almost all tested malignant conditions from benign ones, also those with inconclusive cytology. The 9p21 locus, carrying the p16(INK4A) gene, was homozygously deleted in two of the metastatic cancers, while this was seen in 12 of the 21 malignant mesotheliomas. Thus the commercial UroVysion-test can be used to accurately distinguish malignant and reactive cells in effusions, particularly when cytology is inconclusive. The test may also indicate presence of MM.

Citing Articles

Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology.

Hjerpe A, Demir E, Abd-Own S, Dobra K Cancer Med. 2022; 12(5):5334-5340.

PMID: 36259232 PMC: 10028146. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5353.


Detection of carcinoma in serous effusions: a review.

Li M, Zhao L, Zhou X, Zhang K, Yin P, Liu S Am J Cancer Res. 2021; 11(1):43-60.

PMID: 33520359 PMC: 7840719.


Integrative approach to cytologic and molecular diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Hjerpe A, Own S, Dobra K Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020; 9(3):934-943.

PMID: 32676359 PMC: 7354145. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-2019-pps-10.


CDKN2A copy number and p16 expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma in relation to asbestos exposure.

Kettunen E, Savukoski S, Salmenkivi K, Bohling T, Vanhala E, Kuosma E BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1):507.

PMID: 31138176 PMC: 6537412. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5652-y.


Pre-analytical issues in effusion cytology.

Michael C, Davidson B Pleura Peritoneum. 2019; 1(1):45-56.

PMID: 30911607 PMC: 6328068. DOI: 10.1515/pp-2016-0001.