» Articles » PMID: 19478374

Evaluation of Tilted Cone-beam CT Orbits in the Development of a Dedicated Hybrid Mammotomograph

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2009 May 30
PMID 19478374
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A compact dedicated 3D breast SPECT-CT (mammotomography) system is currently under development. In its initial prototype, the cone-beam CT sub-system is restricted to a fixed-tilt circular rotation around the patient's pendant breast. This study evaluated stationary-tilt angles for the CT sub-system that will enable maximal volumetric sampling and viewing of the breast and chest wall. Images of geometric/anthropomorphic phantoms were acquired using various fixed-tilt circular and 3D sinusoidal trajectories. The iteratively reconstructed images showed more distortion and attenuation coefficient inaccuracy from tilted cone-beam orbits than from the complex trajectory. Additionally, line profiles illustrated cupping artifacts in planes distal to the central plane of the tilted cone-beam, otherwise not apparent for images acquired with complex trajectories. This indicates that undersampled cone-beam data may be an additional cause of cupping artifacts. High-frequency objects could be distinguished for all trajectories, but their shapes and locations were corrupted by out-of-plane frequency information. Although more acrylic balls were visualized with a fixed-tilt and nearly flat cone-beam at the posterior of the breast, 3D complex trajectories have less distortion and more complete sampling throughout the reconstruction volume. While complex trajectories would ideally be preferred, negatively fixed-tilt source-detector configuration demonstrates minimally distorted patient images.

Citing Articles

Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast CT: Reproducibility of Volumetric Glandular Fraction with Advanced Image Reconstruction Methods.

Vedantham S, Tseng H, Fu Z, Chow H Tomography. 2023; 9(6):2039-2051.

PMID: 37987346 PMC: 10661286. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060160.


Cone-beam breast CT using an offset detector: effect of detector offset and image reconstruction algorithm.

Tseng H, Karellas A, Vedantham S Phys Med Biol. 2022; 67(8).

PMID: 35316793 PMC: 9045275. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5fe1.


Characterization of CT Hounsfield Units for 3D acquisition trajectories on a dedicated breast CT system.

Shah J, Mann S, McKinley R, Tornai M J Xray Sci Technol. 2018; 26(4):535-551.

PMID: 29689765 PMC: 6102078. DOI: 10.3233/XST-17350.


Three dimensional dose distribution comparison of simple and complex acquisition trajectories in dedicated breast CT.

Shah J, Mann S, McKinley R, Tornai M Med Phys. 2015; 42(8):4497-510.

PMID: 26233179 PMC: 4499047. DOI: 10.1118/1.4923169.


Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.

Chen L, Boone J, Abbey C, Hargreaves J, Bateni C, Lindfors K Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(8):3347-58.

PMID: 25825980 PMC: 4414405. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/3347.


References
1.
Boone J, Kwan A, Yang K, Burkett G, Lindfors K, Nelson T . Computed tomography for imaging the breast. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2006; 11(2):103-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10911-006-9017-1. View

2.
Shreve P . Adding structure to function. J Nucl Med. 2000; 41(8):1380-2. View

3.
Bartolac S, Clackdoyle R, Noo F, Siewerdsen J, Moseley D, Jaffray D . A local shift-variant Fourier model and experimental validation of circular cone-beam computed tomography artifacts. Med Phys. 2009; 36(2):500-12. PMC: 2673674. DOI: 10.1118/1.3062875. View

4.
Kudo H, Saito T . Feasible cone beam scanning methods for exact reconstruction in three-dimensional tomography. J Opt Soc Am A. 1990; 7(12):2169-83. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.7.002169. View

5.
Smith B . Image reconstruction from cone-beam projections: necessary and sufficient conditions and reconstruction methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1985; 4(1):14-25. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.1985.4307689. View