» Articles » PMID: 19458257

Efficient Acquisition of Dual Metastasis Organotropism to Bone and Lung Through Stable Spontaneous Fusion Between MDA-MB-231 Variants

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2009 May 22
PMID 19458257
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cell fusion is involved in many critical developmental processes, including zygote formation and organogenesis of placenta, bone, and skeletal muscle. In adult tissues, cell fusion has been shown to play an active role in tissue regeneration and repair, and its frequency of occurrence is significantly increased during chronic inflammation. Fusion between tumor cells and normal cells, or among tumor cells themselves, has also been speculated to contribute to tumor initiation, as well as phenotypic evolution during cancer progression and metastasis. Here, we show that dual metastasis organotropisms can be acquired in the same cell through in vitro or in vivo spontaneous fusion between bone- and lung-tropic sublines of the MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell line. The synkaryonic hybrids assimilate organ-specific metastasis gene signatures from both parental cells and are genetically and phenotypically stable. Our study suggests cell fusion as an efficient means of phenotypic evolution during tumor progression and additionally demonstrates the compatibility of different metastasis organotropisms.

Citing Articles

Cell fusion as a driver of metastasis: re-evaluating an old hypothesis in the age of cancer heterogeneity.

Lopez-Collazo E, Hurtado-Navarro L Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1524781.

PMID: 39967663 PMC: 11832717. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1524781.


The Phenotypical Characterization of Dual-Nature Hybrid Cells in Uveal Melanoma.

Marcotte E, Goyeneche A, Abdouh M, Burnier J, Burnier Jr M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39335202 PMC: 11429545. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183231.


EL4 Murine-Lymphoma-Stromal-Cell Fusion Hybrids Observed With Multiple Distinct Morphologies in the Primary Tumor and Metastatic Organs of a Syngeneic Mouse Model.

Yamashita K, Suetsugu A, Hayashi S, Shimizu M, Hoffman R In Vivo. 2024; 38(5):2115-2121.

PMID: 39187323 PMC: 11363744. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13673.


How Much Do You Fuse? A Comparison of Cell Fusion Assays in a Breast Cancer Model.

Sieler M, Dornen J, Dittmar T Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38891857 PMC: 11172233. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115668.


Decoding the interplay between genetic and non-genetic drivers of metastasis.

Karras P, Black J, McGranahan N, Marine J Nature. 2024; 629(8012):543-554.

PMID: 38750233 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07302-6.


References
1.
Cowan C, Atienza J, Melton D, Eggan K . Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science. 2005; 309(5739):1369-73. DOI: 10.1126/science.1116447. View

2.
Brazelton T, Rossi F, Keshet G, Blau H . From marrow to brain: expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice. Science. 2000; 290(5497):1775-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1775. View

3.
M Pawelek J, Chakraborty A . Fusion of tumour cells with bone marrow-derived cells: a unifying explanation for metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8(5):377-86. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2371. View

4.
Mezey E, Chandross K, Harta G, Maki R, McKercher S . Turning blood into brain: cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. Science. 2000; 290(5497):1779-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1779. View

5.
Terada N, Hamazaki T, Oka M, Hoki M, Mastalerz D, Nakano Y . Bone marrow cells adopt the phenotype of other cells by spontaneous cell fusion. Nature. 2002; 416(6880):542-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature730. View