» Articles » PMID: 18762289

Recognition of Natural Scenes from Global Properties: Seeing the Forest Without Representing the Trees

Overview
Journal Cogn Psychol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2008 Sep 3
PMID 18762289
Citations 155
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human observers are able to rapidly and accurately categorize natural scenes, but the representation mediating this feat is still unknown. Here we propose a framework of rapid scene categorization that does not segment a scene into objects and instead uses a vocabulary of global, ecological properties that describe spatial and functional aspects of scene space (such as navigability or mean depth). In Experiment 1, we obtained ground truth rankings on global properties for use in Experiments 2-4. To what extent do human observers use global property information when rapidly categorizing natural scenes? In Experiment 2, we found that global property resemblance was a strong predictor of both false alarm rates and reaction times in a rapid scene categorization experiment. To what extent is global property information alone a sufficient predictor of rapid natural scene categorization? In Experiment 3, we found that the performance of a classifier representing only these properties is indistinguishable from human performance in a rapid scene categorization task in terms of both accuracy and false alarms. To what extent is this high predictability unique to a global property representation? In Experiment 4, we compared two models that represent scene object information to human categorization performance and found that these models had lower fidelity at representing the patterns of performance than the global property model. These results provide support for the hypothesis that rapid categorization of natural scenes may not be mediated primarily though objects and parts, but also through global properties of structure and affordance.

Citing Articles

Cortical Encoding of Spatial Structure and Semantic Content in 3D Natural Scenes.

Mononen R, Saarela T, Vallinoja J, Olkkonen M, Henriksson L J Neurosci. 2025; 45(9).

PMID: 39788741 PMC: 11866997. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2157-23.2024.


Memory-based predictions prime perceptual judgments across head turns in immersive, real-world scenes.

Mynick A, Steel A, Jayaraman A, Botch T, Burrows A, Robertson C Curr Biol. 2024; 35(1):121-130.e6.

PMID: 39694030 PMC: 11831858. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.11.024.


No evidence for a privileged role of global ensemble statistics in rapid scene perception: A registered replication attempt.

Guo J, Pratt J, Walther D Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 87(2):685-697.

PMID: 39658730 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02994-4.


Electroencephalographic Responses to the Number of Objects in Partially Occluded and Uncovered Scenes.

Baykan C, Schutz A J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 37(1):227-238.

PMID: 39436218 PMC: 7617299. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02264.


Anchor objects drive realism while diagnostic objects drive categorization in GAN generated scenes.

Kallmayer A, Vo M Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):68.

PMID: 39242968 PMC: 11332195. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00119-z.


References
1.
Alvarez G, Oliva A . The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(4):392-8. PMC: 2587223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02098.x. View

2.
Leopold D, OToole A, Vetter T, Blanz V . Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(1):89-94. DOI: 10.1038/82947. View

3.
Biederman I, RABINOWITZ J, Glass A, Stacy Jr E . On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. J Exp Psychol. 1974; 103(3):597-600. DOI: 10.1037/h0037158. View

4.
Potter M . Meaning in visual search. Science. 1975; 187(4180):965-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1145183. View

5.
Webster M, Kaping D, Mizokami Y, Duhamel P . Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature. 2004; 428(6982):557-61. DOI: 10.1038/nature02420. View