» Articles » PMID: 19384419

The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2009 Apr 23
PMID 19384419
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eukaryotic cells extend pseudopodia for movement. In the absence of external cues, cells move in random directions, but with a strong element of persistence that keeps them moving in the same direction Persistence allows cells to disperse over larger areas and is instrumental to enter new environments where spatial cues can lead the cell. Here we explore cell movement by analyzing the direction, size and timing of approximately 2000 pseudopodia that are extended by Dictyostelium cells. The results show that pseudpopod are extended perpendicular to the surface curvature at the place where they emerge. The location of new pseudopods is not random but highly ordered. Two types of pseudopodia may be formed: frequent splitting of an existing pseudopod, or the occasional extension of a de novo pseudopod at regions devoid of recent pseudopod activity. Split-pseudopodia are extended at approximately 60 degrees relative to the previous pseudopod, mostly as alternating Right/Left/Right steps leading to relatively straight zigzag runs. De novo pseudopodia are extended in nearly random directions thereby interrupting the zigzag runs. Persistence of cell movement is based on the ratio of split versus de novo pseudopodia. We identify PLA2 and cGMP signaling pathways that modulate this ratio of splitting and de novo pseudopodia, and thereby regulate the dispersal of cells. The observed ordered extension of pseudopodia in the absence of external cues provides a fundamental insight into the coordinated movement of cells, and might form the basis for movement that is directed by internal or external cues.

Citing Articles

Excitable Ras dynamics-based screens reveal RasGEFX is required for macropinocytosis and random cell migration.

Iwamoto K, Matsuoka S, Ueda M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):117.

PMID: 39746985 PMC: 11696275. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55389-2.


Dynamic cluster field modeling of collective chemotaxis.

Paspunurwar A, Moure A, Gomez H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25162.

PMID: 39448677 PMC: 11502788. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75653-1.


Pseudopod Tracking and Statistics During Cell Movement in Buffer and Chemotaxis.

van Haastert P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2828:185-204.

PMID: 39147978 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4023-4_14.


Three-component contour dynamics model to simulate and analyze amoeboid cell motility in two dimensions.

Schindler D, Moldenhawer T, Beta C, Huisinga W, Holschneider M PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0297511.

PMID: 38277351 PMC: 10817190. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297511.


Active oscillations in microscale navigation.

Wan K Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(6):1837-1850.

PMID: 37665482 PMC: 10769930. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01819-5.


References
1.
Tang L, Franca-Koh J, Xiong Y, Chen M, Long Y, Bickford R . tsunami, the Dictyostelium homolog of the Fused kinase, is required for polarization and chemotaxis. Genes Dev. 2008; 22(16):2278-90. PMC: 2518819. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1694508. View

2.
Clainche C, Carlier M . Regulation of actin assembly associated with protrusion and adhesion in cell migration. Physiol Rev. 2008; 88(2):489-513. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2007. View

3.
Swanson J, Taylor D . Local and spatially coordinated movements in Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae during chemotaxis. Cell. 1982; 28(2):225-32. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90340-3. View

4.
Chung C, Funamoto S, Firtel R . Signaling pathways controlling cell polarity and chemotaxis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001; 26(9):557-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01934-x. View

5.
Xu J, Wang F, Van Keymeulen A, Rentel M, Bourne H . Neutrophil microtubules suppress polarity and enhance directional migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(19):6884-9. PMC: 1087512. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502106102. View