» Articles » PMID: 19381296

A Fragile Balance: Perturbation of GABA Mediated Circuit in Prefrontal Cortex Generates High Intraindividual Performance Variability

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2009 Apr 22
PMID 19381296
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High intraindividual performance variability is one of the most robust findings to emerge in cognitive-experimental research of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Evidences from studies incorporating structural or functional human brain mapping methods indicate that this increased intraindividual variability is not simply a sequel of general brain dysfunction, but is likely related to the functioning of neural circuits that engage the prefrontal cortex, particularly the dorsolateral areas (dlPFC). In order to examine further the anatomical and pharmacological substrate responsible for this high intraindividual variability disorder, we injected GABA(A) antagonist (bicuculline) or GABA(A) agonist (muscimol) in the dlPFC of monkeys performing a reflexive oculomotor task. Here we show that, whereas GABA(A) agonist injection induced no or minimal impairments, injection of GABA(A) antagonist dramatically increased the intraindividual variability of saccade response time and of saccade spatial accuracy (amplitude and direction). Overall, this study demonstrates that the balance between excitatory/inhibitory activities in the dlPFC is fragile but crucial, since local micro-injection of GABA(A) antagonist can induce marked behavioural effects. It also reveals that higher cognitive areas such as the dlPFC are markedly capable to influence the productions and metrics of reflexive movements. Altogether, this study provides promising perspectives for the development of new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of diseases in which high intravariability disorders are a prominent feature.

Citing Articles

Translating Molecular Approaches to Oligodendrocyte-Mediated Neurological Circuit Modulation.

Song J, Saglam A, Zuchero J, Buch V Brain Sci. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39061389 PMC: 11275066. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14070648.


Novel pharmacological targets for GABAergic dysfunction in ADHD.

Ferranti A, Luessen D, Niswender C Neuropharmacology. 2024; 249:109897.

PMID: 38462041 PMC: 11843668. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.109897.


Genome-wide association study in 404,302 individuals identifies 7 significant loci for reaction time variability.

Wootton O, Shadrin A, Mohn C, Susser E, Ramesar R, Gur R Mol Psychiatry. 2023; 28(9):4011-4019.

PMID: 37864076 PMC: 10730420. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02292-9.


Norepinephrine versus dopamine and their interaction in modulating synaptic function in the prefrontal cortex.

Xing B, Li Y, Gao W Brain Res. 2016; 1641(Pt B):217-33.

PMID: 26790349 PMC: 4879059. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.005.


Does variability in cognitive performance correlate with frontal brain volume?.

Lovden M, Schmiedek F, Kennedy K, Rodrigue K, Lindenberger U, Raz N Neuroimage. 2012; 64:209-15.

PMID: 23000256 PMC: 3508369. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.039.


References
1.
Mansouri F, Buckley M, Tanaka K . Mnemonic function of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in conflict-induced behavioral adjustment. Science. 2007; 318(5852):987-90. DOI: 10.1126/science.1146384. View

2.
Bellgrove M, Hester R, Garavan H . The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(14):1910-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.007. View

3.
Constantinidis C, Williams G, Goldman-Rakic P . A role for inhibition in shaping the temporal flow of information in prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(2):175-80. DOI: 10.1038/nn799. View

4.
Stuss D, Murphy K, Binns M, Alexander M . Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 11):2363-80. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg237. View

5.
Castellanos F, Sonuga-Barke E, Milham M, Tannock R . Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(3):117-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.011. View