» Articles » PMID: 19348695

Race and Ancestry in Biomedical Research: Exploring the Challenges

Abstract

The use of race in biomedical research has, for decades, been a source of social controversy. However, recent events, such as the adoption of racially targeted pharmaceuticals, have raised the profile of the race issue. In addition, we are entering an era in which genomic research is increasingly focused on the nature and extent of human genetic variation, often examined by population, which leads to heightened potential for misunderstandings or misuse of terms concerning genetic variation and race. Here, we draw together the perspectives of participants in a recent interdisciplinary workshop on ancestry and health in medicine in order to explore the use of race in research issue from the vantage point of a variety of disciplines. We review the nature of the race controversy in the context of biomedical research and highlight several challenges to policy action, including restrictions resulting from commercial or regulatory considerations, the difficulty in presenting precise terminology in the media, and drifting or ambiguous definitions of key terms.

Citing Articles

The Social Construction of Categorical Data: Mixed Methods Approach to Assessing Data Features in Publicly Available Datasets.

Willem T, Wollek A, Cheslerean-Boghiu T, Kenney M, Buyx A JMIR Med Inform. 2025; 13:e59452.

PMID: 39874567 PMC: 11815297. DOI: 10.2196/59452.


Sociodemographic inequities in overall survival among younger and older women with cervical cancer.

Holt H, Calip G, Peterson C, MacLaughlan David S, Geller S, Guadamuz J Cancer Causes Control. 2025; .

PMID: 39847161 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-025-01961-0.


Diversity of Research Participant Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Publications in 2020.

Millager R, Feldman J, Williams Z, Shibata K, Martinez-Torres K, Bryan K Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2024; 9(3):836-852.

PMID: 38912383 PMC: 11192539. DOI: 10.1044/2024_PERSP-23-00204.


Aspiring toward equitable benefits from genomic advances to individuals of ancestrally diverse backgrounds.

Wang Y, He Y, Shi Y, Qian D, Gray K, Winn R Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(5):809-824.

PMID: 38642557 PMC: 11080611. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.002.


Tubal Sterilization and Cervical Cancer Underscreening in the United States.

Holt H, Martinez G, Reyes M, Saraiya M, Qin J, Sawaya G J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024; 33(6):729-733.

PMID: 38502830 PMC: 11182708. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0610.


References
1.
Choudhry S, Coyle N, Tang H, Salari K, Lind D, Clark S . Population stratification confounds genetic association studies among Latinos. Hum Genet. 2005; 118(5):652-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-005-0071-3. View

2.
Bubela T, Caulfield T . Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. CMAJ. 2004; 170(9):1399-407. PMC: 400292. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1030762. View

3.
Suarez-Kurtz G . The implications of population admixture in race-based drug prescription. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 83(3):399-400. DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100308. View

4.
Foster M, Sharp R, FREEMAN W, Chino M, Bernsten D, Carter T . The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 64(6):1719-27. PMC: 1377916. DOI: 10.1086/302415. View

5.
Cooper R, Kaufman J, Ward R . Race and genomics. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(12):1166-70. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb022863. View