» Articles » PMID: 19338454

Role of Trabecular Microarchitecture in Whole-vertebral Body Biomechanical Behavior

Overview
Date 2009 Apr 3
PMID 19338454
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral biomechanical behavior remains unclear, and its influence may be obscured by such factors as overall bone mass, bone geometry, and the presence of the cortical shell. To address this issue, 22 human T(9) vertebral bodies (11 female; 11 male; age range: 53-97 yr, 81.5 +/- 9.6 yr) were scanned with microCT and analyzed for measures of trabecular microarchitecture, BMC, cross-sectional area, and cortical thickness. Sixteen of the vertebrae were biomechanically tested to measure compressive strength. To estimate vertebral compressive stiffness with and without the cortical shell for all 22 vertebrae, two high-resolution finite element models per specimen-one intact model and one with the shell removed-were created from the microCT scans and virtually compressed. Results indicated that BMC and the structural model index (SMI) were the individual parameters most highly associated with strength (R(2) = 0.57 each). Adding microarchitecture variables to BMC in a stepwise multiple regression model improved this association (R(2) = 0.85). However, the microarchitecture variables in that regression model (degree of anisotropy, bone volume fraction) differed from those when BMC was not included in the model (SMI, mean trabecular thickness), and the association was slightly weaker for the latter (R(2) = 0.76). The finite element results indicated that the physical presence of the cortical shell did not alter the relationships between microarchitecture and vertebral stiffness. We conclude that trabecular microarchitecture is associated with whole-vertebral biomechanical behavior and that the role of microarchitecture is mediated by BMC but not by the cortical shell.

Citing Articles

Microstructure of the human metastatic vertebral body.

Cavazzoni G, DallAra E, Palanca M Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15():1508504.

PMID: 39835261 PMC: 11743553. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1508504.


Impact of anti-fracture medications on bone material and strength properties: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sharma S, Shankar V, Rajender S, Mithal A, Rao S, Chattopadhyay N Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1426490.

PMID: 39257899 PMC: 11384599. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1426490.


Relationships Among Bone Morphological Parameters and Mechanical Properties of Cadaveric Human Vertebral Cancellous Bone.

Al-Barghouthi A, Lee S, Solitro G, Latta L, Travascio F JBMR Plus. 2023; 4(5):e10351.

PMID: 37780057 PMC: 10540741. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10351.


A Shrewd Inspection of Vertebral Regionalization in Large Shrews (Soricidae: Crocidurinae).

Smith S, Angielczyk K Integr Org Biol. 2022; 4(1):obac006.

PMID: 35291671 PMC: 8915212. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obac006.


Biomechanical Study of the Osteoporotic Spine Fracture: Optical Approach.

Sopon M, Oleksik V, Roman M, Cofaru N, Oleksik M, Mohor C J Pers Med. 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34575684 PMC: 8469636. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090907.


References
1.
Kopperdahl D, Morgan E, Keaveny T . Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20(4):801-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00185-1. View

2.
Banse X, Devogelaer J, Munting E, Delloye C, Cornu O, Grynpas M . Inhomogeneity of human vertebral cancellous bone: systematic density and structure patterns inside the vertebral body. Bone. 2001; 28(5):563-71. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00425-2. View

3.
Odgaard A, Gundersen H . Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone. 1993; 14(2):173-82. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90245-6. View

4.
Heaney R . Is the paradigm shifting?. Bone. 2003; 33(4):457-65. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00236-9. View

5.
Hulme P, Boyd S, Ferguson S . Regional variation in vertebral bone morphology and its contribution to vertebral fracture strength. Bone. 2007; 41(6):946-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.019. View